I'll suggest something different . . . why don't we spend less time arguing over the election process and spend more supporting the VR member undergoing replacement today?
ok, so you don't exactly know they're not flagging them, you're assuming...i assume.
I'd say that's about the same ratio for Fox News.
Me too.Don't know about everyone else, but I'm scanning all the forums as always.
It's not our church address that is used. I have not personally done a Place of Residence assignment, but friends that have helped do that say that there are specific steps and specific forms of addresses that are used. It's not randomly picking a place and saying "That's good." This is not just for voting, but for receipt of mail.sorry. i shoulda said "don't all u.s. citizens over the age of 18 and not
convicted of felonies have the right to vote."
has anyone recently used your church address to register and then vote?
has that been contested yet? odds are pretty good for it this year.
Don't know about everyone else, but I'm scanning all the forums as always.
You're kiddin me right?? How is it possible to recount multiple times; but only in certain democratic counties rather than the entire state? And really; counting a dimpled chad as a vote; that could very well disenfranchise a voter who chose to not vote for that race. Let me guess; I need to explain that there is no such thing as a national vote with the exception of the electoral college?You had me there, Ben, until you slipped in "stopped" where most voters in that election would have put "facilitated".
kidding aside, doesn't everyone have the right to vote? if so, then we should take into account those with no permanent address. if they're on any sort of welfare, then maybe can use that disbursement office as residence in lieu of. or what would be your solution?
I think you are missing the larger picture here......
Yes, they have a right to vote; but to bussed to the polling station and coached as to what to vote for.......what would you call that......
ah, so they are NOT flagging questionable applications?
you know something the rest of the world doesn't?
community organizing?
I mention it because I almost missed adding a pre-surgery best wishes post. I consider offering a pre-surgery support post one of the most important thing I can contribute to VR.com.
What really cracks me up is people believing this hype that both candidates are touting. Neither one of them can change a thing without legislative approval and going through the checks and balances. They are proclaiming things that they have no way (and most likely) no intentions of delivering, yet people are buying into it simply fantasizing change.
I don't think that anyone would see this as appropriate,it is COERCIONTelling them That their candidate is going to solve their personal issues and get them a roof over their head that they can call their own.
You won't have to worry about anything if you vote for the candidate they tell you too. They even show a rendition of the ballot and where you should vote on every issue and candidate.
Do you beleive that is appropriate?
I mention it because I almost missed adding a pre-surgery best wishes post. I consider offering a pre-surgery support post one of the most important thing I can contribute to VR.com.
I don't think that anyone would see this as appropriate,it is COERCION
plain and simple.
And the account Karlynn gave of her brother is most definitely infuriating,
It's hard to believe,yet I am not really surprised anymore.