user 15848
Liborio
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2015
- Messages
- 286
As long as a Tissue valve is made out of "Tissue", the human body see it a "foreign" tissue , etc.
My, my, my........you are testy this morning......I must have hit a nerve.When you speak of “old” men, speak for yourself. “Old” is not a well defined term, and quite frankly I am no old man. I’ll put my athletic skills up against most 40 year olds.
Well it breaks my heart when I hear or read about someone who decided on a mechanical valve just to find out the day after surgery how difficult and complicated taking blood thinners can be (for them) or the ticking noise was louder than they thought and/or know one told them about it. Yes people coming here should be able to read everything regarding heart valves and so I am doing my part by stating the facts about both types of valves. The inspiris valve from Edward’s under rigorous testing has been shown to last 25-30 years or more. Mechanical valves may no longer have the longevity advantage for anyone north of 50.
I have learned more from all that have had tissue, Mechanical and other valves in the last 20 years of being here. I was 36 when I have mine dome and happy to be alive.Point of order here.
1. In an earlier post you said this obviously is a site for mechanical valves. I have been on this site for a very long time. My profile says 2016 but I started lurking here, and may even have had an earlier account, many many many years earlier, certainly when a mechanical valve would have been my best option. Tissue or mechanical, this site and many of the interactions/support have/has been invaluable, and remains so...and part of my knowledge base.
2. On the TAVR issue. I don't think anybody knows how long any valve will last. Some people have tissue valves fail rather quickly, but most report 8-15 years. My surgeon gave me 8-12, with sizing for a new one via TAVR when the time comes.... assuming (and only Pellicle will laugh at this) I'm still here. I'm very realistic.... to the point of knowing that a TAVR is not guaranteed. We have no idea what the level of calcification will be and whether the slight leak in my mitral valve will get works or "remodel" to no leak as my heart adjusts to the new valve.... or whatever else comes along. As I wrote here at some point (or two or three) my surgeon, a lead investigator in the Resilia – he put the first one in a patient at the CC in 2018 – still chose an older model for me.
3. There is no right or wrong. It's very personal. Even at my age my surgeon gave me the pros/cons of tissue vs mechanical and had me choose. He told me he agreed with my choice, but then felt the older model was better for me.
4. I hate to see anybody get testy here. Not worth it. If having to get a new valve teaches you nothing else, it's to reduce the tension, not increase it. Pellicle figured that one out a long time ago. I'm slowly getting there. Many of us do an enormous amount of research, and while we're not experts, it's often about little more than being as informed as possible.
Cheers,
Herb
pretty much on the money there, especially with the myriad of factors we each can't understand from the question asker.There is no right or wrong. It's very personal.
I like this rule - although I think I just violated it.I have a rule which I often forget and need to remind myself of now and then: only reply to questions asked either by the OP or directly of me.
don't worry ... I self violate oftenI like this rule - although I think I just violated it.
don't worry ... I self violate often
... wait what I mean is ...
Wow, things have gotten a little heated on this thread since I last looked le19555. Turns out I am prepared for a nasty tweet back from you to defend this board.
Hello All- one week out from my new mechanical valve and 2nd recovery suckks!!! Sure appreciate reading everyone’s perspectives and research and think what I found would help.
i prioritized my doc over the valve, but was pretty sure I was going tissue for the back to normal seduction. My cardiologist surgeon told me then, you pick the first one, I’ll pick the second one.
Had a good recovery and went back to active lifestyle at 43 and enjoyed almost 8 good years. Then backto chf, rhythm issues (pacemaker on July 29) and the news that the time was now for a replacement. My reg cardio said I could get a new tissue and plan for a couple TAVR’s and that would cover the next thirty years (81yo). However, during my surgical consult, Dr Hughes at Duke. I reqlly can’t say enough about how pleased I am. Said with the lack of lifespan of the current tissue valves and TAVR and he didn’t want to pop the hood again, we were going mechanical. Hopefully O2 but didn’t fit- big valve.
2nd surgery- not fun. 8 yrs older, now a diabetic and with a pacemaker, I still thought I could just roll in there and magically walk 3 miles on first week anniversary and blow the full spiro 4000 on Day 4 just by waking up. This most definitely did not happen. Advice- treat this event like the fight of your life it is. Get sugars right, get your breathing as good as you can and exercise as much as doc allows. I was supposed to walk 45 min a day at 3mph. It is a mental and physical and spiritual fight and I found myself falling into what if I never get to eat pasta again! This ain’t for the weak my friends.
so surgery went well enough. Heart stopped a couple of times and they repaired my growing aortic aneurysm (4.3 cm) surgery required at 5.5 cm. Afib once on Day 3. But doc was almost positive that would happen and the amilioderone drip eventually righted the ship. Surgery 7am Monday, discharged 11am Saturday. Woke up today feeling good enough to skip the heeavy pain meds and hopefully can continue.
Thought this synopsis could help everyone experience my thoughts and question them. I feel we are all on a spectrum to discover which is best for us and you make your best decision and go. Do I take the vaccine, do I go with tissue, do I take the job in California.
I was a guy who hated needle sticks, wanted to continue playing basketball and could live a “normal” life. I was told the valve I was getting could be third generation and last forever, but to expect 15/20 years hopefully. Discussed it w my wife and she left it to me but fully supported the tissue valve decision. I was the lucky 5% that developed rhythm issues and my tissue time was cut short. But I did develop them at 51 and my aortic aneurysm was caught early. Life is life.
Looking today, I probably would have gone mechanical valve just because these valves are not lasting significantly longer and I am an indoor guy anyways, esp now.
thanks for letting me get this down. I appreciate what everyone is going thru and understand the need for the perfect decision but sometimes we make our best guess and hope for the best.
also, remember these docs make little follow up money on the one and dones. Money runs the world yo.
Hokie Sid
Edit- pellicle, please feel free to respond if you like. I thoroughly enjoy your input
thanks for letting me get this down. I appreciate what everyone is going thru and understand the need for the perfect decision but sometimes we make our best guess and hope for the best.
also, remember these docs make little follow up money on the one and dones. Money runs the world yo.
My cardiologist surgeon told me then, you pick the first one, I’ll pick the second one.
Had a good recovery and went back to active lifestyle at 43 and enjoyed almost 8 good years.
its my observation that many newbies don't value that experience ...you have a valued perspective
best laugh I've had for daysAnthony Jeselnik
its my observation that many newbies don't value that experience ...
now don't you be denying agency to the elderly ... that's worse than transphobia, homophobia, fatism and **** shaming ...A particular newbie is coming to mind right now, lol
Enter your email address to join: