Hi
Could you put your comment, in layman's terms, and in a shorter paragraph ?
Firstly, its not a comment, its a quote from that reference (we call that a citation). For me to change that would be unethical unless I make a statement and then just make a reference to "evidence that supported that"
For instance (from wikipedia): As of 2023, Stellantis was the world's fourth-largest automaker by sales, behind
Toyota,
Volkswagen Group, and
Hyundai Motor Group.
[13]
when you hover on that [13] in wikipedia you get a popup showing where that statement about Stellantis was supported with evidence (meaning the author didn't just pull it out of the back of their shorts)
So, if you are asking me to explain the following:
Results: We included 462,619 participants (mean age at baseline 57.0 years [SD 8.1]). With a mean follow-up of 11.7 years (SD 1.7), 4,998 developed all-cause dementia. Social isolation was associated with a 1.26-fold increased risk of dementia (95% CI, 1.15-1.37) independently of various risk factors including loneliness and depression (i.e., full adjustment). However, the fully adjusted hazard ratio for dementia related to loneliness was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.94-1.16) and 75% of this relationship was attributable to depressive symptoms. Structural MRI data were obtained from 32,263 participants (mean age 63.5 years [SD 7.5]). Socially isolated individuals had lower GMVs in temporal, frontal, and other (e.g., hippocampal) regions.
... then I would ask what part don't you understand and what would you like me to explain, because I'm not going to spend an hour typing up something and not actually hit what you wanted.
I would suggest that its also important for you to understand terms like "all-cause XXX" where XXX could be dementia, or mortality or ... and any words you don't understand you should google
"Teach a man to fish ..."