Well, at least I feel validated by my earlier post. I asked for inaccuracies, and then pointed out that the notes about shaving, flossing, and Vitamin K were the only ones I could find. Of course, most of the responses to my original post re-pointed those same ones out to me.
The note about blows to the head is right on. If someone posted on this site that they had just hit their head really hard, would you suggest the sit at home and see what happens?
Secondly, you can't point out the second line about alcohol without pointing out the first. It is: "Alcohol can change the way that an anticoagulant works." Is that not true? I think it's pretty well documented on this site that alcohol affects a person's INR. Given that, do you expect this pamphlet or any doctor to recommend alcohol use?
My root frustration with this thread is an argument that we had just a few weeks ago. The subject is a 28-page pamphlet which basically gives the ins and outs of valve surgery is ripped apart because of 3-4 sentences. I wish UCLA would have given me this much information.
On the other hand, I realize that for some of you, no mention of drug interactions, side effects, or difficulties pertaining to the use of Coumadin is acceptable. So I guess this literature had no chance to begin with, did it?