The original poster is long gone . . . I wish you two understood each other better. You just have very different ways of making decisions. How about this thought script before posting
For Pellicle: I really believe that logic and data are primary and that's what I can contribute. Logic and data comfort me and help me decide things. Other people make decisions more intuitively and actually become anxious at a flood of data - that's hard for me to relate to, but I accept that this is a valid way to make a decision. It's not a personal attack for someone to say trust your instincts if it helps some people make decisions. Anxiety and decision paralysis is clearly medically bad.
For Neil: I think that intuition and gut feelings are reliable guides that can help bring peace with decisions. I think logic and data have their limitations. Too much feels stressful to me and can actually hurt my decision making, and I worry that others on the forum might feel the same way. I accept though that some folks ARE looking for data and are actually really comforted by it. I don't have to protect others on the forum from data. They can read it or not, their choice.
I'm pretty much right in between so I value each of you at different times, but I think nobody wants the fighting. What would happen if you both just said "Pellicle is our data king and Neil is great at encouraging people to consider their intuition in making a choice and be at peace." Some proactive affirmation of each other's gifts and ways of making decisions would go a long way. Maybe we don't need another episode of "Well, THAT escalated quickly . . . " Peace, man. Don't harsh our vibe . . .
Meantime here is a really interesting podcast on choice and the brain - I thought people might enjoy it
http://www.radiolab.org/story/91640-choice/