hall
Well-known member
Hang in there and see what happens with the scan. Lets hope it is good news.
I had a similar situation, Bob. My echo was actually okay (3 inch dilated) but an MRI showed it to be a 5.4. So they elected to perform surgery on me to replace my ascending aorta — and it turned out it was a 6.2 a month after the MRI!
My advice would be to pursue this aggressively, because echos dont always tell the whole story. Of course, it could be overestimating the size, but in any case, get it checked out! you've gone down this road before, and it sucks, but it beats the alternative!
Thanks again, guys. Now I am wondering what's the difference between a CT-scan and an MRI as far as the aorta is concerned. Is one more precise than the other?
I also am remembering I had to have an echo in Virginia last fall (before we moved) as a precaution before my knee surgery, and for some reason the results are not in my file that was transferred to SC. (My new cardio is comparing results of his echo a week ago with one that was taken post-op in 2006. If accurate, there does appear to be an enlargement.)
Thought I would call Monday morning and see if I could get the 2008 echo report faxed -- if the aorta didn't change much in a year, maybe I could get out of the CT-scan? Damn, I don't want to go down this road! If there is enlargement, I can't fathom going through all this again. What would cause an enlargement after a replacement anyway? They haven't detected any significant leakage.
If anyone is reading my stream of consciousness venting, thank you!
Right, stop worrying and just to be on the safe side, stay away from the bikini babes.