Welcome
Welcome
I know you're facing a tough choice that you hope to live with for some time. I had AVR on July 21 and initially thought about a mechanical valve. My surgeon didn't try to influence me but I believe he had more experience with tissue valves.
He told me three things that changed my mind about mechanical vs tissue: 1) the new treated bovine valves look like they may last 20 years based on trials with sheep; 2) even though coumadin (warfarin) is something you can live with and doesn't seem to restrict activity, it is still something that you need to take and monitor for the rest of your life; and 3) the chair of the Department of Thoracic Surgery at Harvard recently had an AVR done (at the Cleveland Clinic- you know they are good!) and chose a bovine valve. He is, I believe, a bit younger than me (I'm 58).
So if it was good enough for him I thought it would be good enough for me
My thinking is best case I get 20 years and then replacement is done robotically through an artery (for all patients not just high risk).
Unfortunately for me, I developed an atrial fibrillation (which is quite common after OHS) then went out then went back in and then went out again. I'm pretty sure my heartbeat is regular now but I was put on warfarin and amiodarone
. My last visit to the surgeon showed no a fib and I return in early September. If I don't have it then, I will be taken off both meds. But what I didn't know pre-surgery was that a tissue valve doesn't necessarily guarantee no anti-coag therapy. My experience hasn't necessarily been bad but my numbers are still not regulated so I have to go to the lab at least once a week for monitoring. And there's no guarantee that I will ever get off of it.
Having written all that, I agree with GeeBee - the only bad choice is no choice so make yours and don't look back. Either way you're a winner!