LoveMyBraveHeart
Well-known member
My husband was concerned over an anti-coagulation regimen, so chose a tissue valve. The valve failed in less than 6 weeks (that is not a typo, he went back into heart failure in a few short weeks. And no, it wasn't because of surgeon experience as he was operated on by the world class Lars Svensson of the Cleveland Clinic). They attempted a TAVR procedure to repair it. That was unsuccessful. He had OHS 9 months after his first and chose an On-X valve. While I understand the progression that has been made in TAVR and how it is appealing to many (it was a large reason we chose a tissue valve the first time...who wouldn't like the opportunity for their valve to be replaced via TAVR instead of OHS), I am happy to have a husband that is alive and well...his faulty tissue valve nearly killed him. Oh well that he takes Warfarin. No big deal for him. I think while it is important for any one in the "waiting room" for their valve replacement to weight the pros and cons of a mechanical valve, I think it's equally as important to research tissue valves and their pros and cons. Each valve comes with them, even "brands" have pros and cons. So, you may see very little reason to select a mechanical valve, however, my husband's life is a good indicator to me of a strong reason to choose a mechanical valve, and many other's share similar views. Which is not to say that tissue valves can't or aren't a successful option; they absolutely are, but they aren't the right choice for everyone. Just as Mechanical valves may not be the right choice for everyone. He is only 26, by the way, and has 3 OHS and one TAVR, all in less than 9 months. Mechanical was and still is our first choice.
Thank you for the reminder of how far he has come in such a short time...boy am I grateful!
Be well,
Jill
Thank you for the reminder of how far he has come in such a short time...boy am I grateful!
Be well,
Jill