I think a lot of this is "relative." If you were 85 years old and had a failing valve, would you rather do nothing and perhaps not see your 86th, or have a smaller, restricted valve implanted and have to lead a quieter life until you die some time later? It may also be true that elderly patients do not need as much blood supply to their bodies, as they are less likely to engage in strenuous activities.
The potential trade-off's are endless, but having yet another option out there will definitely mean that more people can live longer lives in spite of failing heart valves.
As I said before, I'm not managing my life counting on TAVR for the next valve, but if it is available and is a good option for me in the future, I'd be glad to try it.
The potential trade-off's are endless, but having yet another option out there will definitely mean that more people can live longer lives in spite of failing heart valves.
As I said before, I'm not managing my life counting on TAVR for the next valve, but if it is available and is a good option for me in the future, I'd be glad to try it.