P
Phyllis
Here is an update from last night. The updates are quite extensive and I truly suggest that you keep up with them by going to the blog quoted in Shannon's first post: http://echobaby.blogspot.com/
Was the surgery a success?
Yes, it was a success BUT it was not an unqualified repair. As we expected, this less invasive option did not make it possible to get all of the stenosis in the valve. Basically, the aortic valve IS too small and although Dr Hanley opened the leaflets a bit by cutting some attachment at the base of the leaflet AND shaved the leaflets where they had thickened a mild-moderate gradient remains.
In my previous post I said that Dr H would leave the repair if the gradient was <35. Well, it was 34. He says that it may come down a bit post-op but it will go up again over time as scarring develops. He hopes to make it till Wren is 7 or 8 when he should be able to fit a large enough valve to last till adulthood. His view is that you want a Kono to be the final valve replacement if at all possible - taking down konos is risky and complex.
So, we are relieved he has his valve and has a chance to do very well for years BUT of course we are anxious about the progression of gradient from mild-mod to MODERATE to SEVERE. Before surgery Wren's gradient was 75+ and classed as severe.
The other interesting comment was that while the patch above the valve was very straightforward, the sub-aortic tissue was very complex. It was dense, fibrous, scarred and extremely tight. It extended to the mitral valve and was attached to it.
Dr Hanley had to remove quite a lot of tissue in the resection to get at the obstruction.
However, he was pleased to see that both valves work well even though they are not normal anatomy. His mitral valve is only mildly parachute and his aortic valve is good for a bicuspid. He went so far as to say that IF the subaortic obstruction recurs in 2-3 years he would recommend a repeat opening of the valve and LVOT - perhaps being more aggressive in treatment of the AV.
This time, he achieved satisfactory improvement without regurg. He explained that when you work on a valve you have to balance leakage and constriction. If you do too much work to address constriction, you get leakage. If you have too much leakage you have to constrict the valve. In this case, there was no leakage immediately post-op.