Yes you can visit!!! And I highly recommend it...they are very gracious and it is very interesting. They have a giant display of all the valves they ever made, from the very early mechanicals to today's catheter. When you make arrangements, they ask for your serial number. If possible, you get to meet the employees who made your valve! It is very emotional, for both you and the workers.
Those are also the ones I'm talking about. And I think the biggest and best studies show that some of those good valves last longer than others. It used to be "standard wisdom" that cow valves lasted longer than pig valves, even though both were "good" and in common use for decades. I believe the newest and best studies (including the "Gold Standard" study on my valve from my hospital) shows the opposite, that the Hancock II has been lasting quite a bit longer than the CEP.When I said the leading valves were good, I was talking about the ones around over 25 years, the same ones I was talking about this entire thread.
As for the "gold standard study" that (I think they said they had good results for the oldest age group?) as I said earlier, beside reading a study with a few hundred people, . . .
"[16]" refers to a 2010 Ann. Thorac. Surg article entitled "Late outcomes for aortic valve replacment with the Carpentier-Edwards peicardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patents."McClure and colleagues [16] recently published the long-term outcomes of 1000 patients who had AVR with the CEP. . . . According to Figure 2 in their article, . . . they reported a freedom from reoperation due to SVD at 15 years of 34.7% in patients younger than 65 years and 89.4% in patients aged 65 to 75. The freedom from SVD with the Hancock II at 15 years was 80.7% +/- 2.6% for patients younger than 65 and 99.0% +/- 4.2% for patients aged 65 and older.[emphasis added]
Enter your email address to join: