MikeHeim
Well-known member
I have a question that has been bothering me for some time, and probably will get me blasted by many others in the group (again
).
Why do some parents with BAV feel the need to immediately screen all of their children for the same condition? I can immediately think of several examples on this list, but I certainly don't want to single anyone out. From my experience on this list alone, it appears that many people don't discover that they have BAV until in their 40's, 50's, or even later. From information I have found on other websites, it sounds like a certain percentage of the population has BAV, it never causes a problem, and the person lives a full and "normal" life without ever knowing they have a heart condition.
Is it really fair to a child to be diagnosed with a heart issue when they are early in life, and then have to live with that burden (even though it is not causing any problems and may, in fact, never cause any problems)?
Personally, I never knew I had any valve problem until I was almost 29 and began to have symptoms. I thank God for the 28 years that I ran around blissfully unaware and lifted weights, ran marathons, and pushed myself and my body as I pleased. Of course, it is very possible that if I had found out about the heart issues earlier, I may have been able to make some lifestyle changes and pushed off surgery by 10-20 years, or even longer. Regardless, I wouldn't trade the recklessness in my 20's for anything. If that meant that I needed heart surgery at 28 instead of 48, so be it.
This post is meant to be a philosophical argument, and I sure many will disagree with me. However, a little debate never hurt anyone, did it?
Why do some parents with BAV feel the need to immediately screen all of their children for the same condition? I can immediately think of several examples on this list, but I certainly don't want to single anyone out. From my experience on this list alone, it appears that many people don't discover that they have BAV until in their 40's, 50's, or even later. From information I have found on other websites, it sounds like a certain percentage of the population has BAV, it never causes a problem, and the person lives a full and "normal" life without ever knowing they have a heart condition.
Is it really fair to a child to be diagnosed with a heart issue when they are early in life, and then have to live with that burden (even though it is not causing any problems and may, in fact, never cause any problems)?
Personally, I never knew I had any valve problem until I was almost 29 and began to have symptoms. I thank God for the 28 years that I ran around blissfully unaware and lifted weights, ran marathons, and pushed myself and my body as I pleased. Of course, it is very possible that if I had found out about the heart issues earlier, I may have been able to make some lifestyle changes and pushed off surgery by 10-20 years, or even longer. Regardless, I wouldn't trade the recklessness in my 20's for anything. If that meant that I needed heart surgery at 28 instead of 48, so be it.
This post is meant to be a philosophical argument, and I sure many will disagree with me. However, a little debate never hurt anyone, did it?