cldlhd;n870239 said:
I don't see a lot of arguments about gravity.
you don't hang around with the right physicists ... the Copenhagen Interpretation is still considered divisive. There is a lot of political wrangling go on about the acceptance of various theories (and lots of funding depends on it {supporting your money view} as well as prestige)
On topic a great "model" to demonstrate the "pilot wave" theory
there are quite a many arguments within science but as they are well out of the sphere of public interest the debates are confined to those interested. At least within the science community the arguments revolve around evidence rather than feelings - even when the evidence is hard to come by. As with gravity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_gravity
Einstein never accepted the Copenhagen Interpretation.
On a far more trivial note I was failed on an exam during my biochem-daze because of an disagreement between my professor and myself on a point which time has proven I was correct on (about Prions which he denied were an example of a transmissible disease). He's dead now (thus provides no opposition) and no one would dispute my point these days either (33 years later) but I didn't ever pass that effing subject.
Science is also embroiled with politics, and so as Max Plank said: "Science advances one funeral at a time." Or (more on topic) Max also said:
"New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment."
and thus devoid of politics