H
hinsocal
Hi all,
I have several questions, but first I wanted to say that this site is terrific. It has helped ease any anxieties about the likelihood of surgery, which I suspect is sooner (as in a year or two) rather than later. Knowing what to expect is half the battle.
My story:
I?m a 55 year old male. The murmur was first detected when I was in my early 20s. I?ve been monitored every other year for most of those years in the various cities in which I have lived, including Chicago, New York and San Francisco (UCSF). Everybody has always told me I'll be in my 70s when this thing has to be replaced, if ever. Famous last words! (At least based on the many great stories from this forum.)
Mine is a bicuspid aortic valve, likely a deformity from birth. I?m in great shape. Exercise regularly on the Eliptical (40 minutes a stretch, 5-6 days a week.) Feel great. Low cholesterol. High blood pressure, but treated with multiple meds. Had a recent scare when my ankles started to swell; turns out it was likely the combo of Niaspan with a new blood pressure medicine. Doc wanted to do a stress echo to be sure. He had just returned from a meeting at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona, where the focus was on the need to start replacing valves on seemingly healthy, asymptomatic people. The idea, as I?ve read here, is to catch it before the heart is damaged. I?ve seen many of your comments on that. But there's early, and then there's early! This test was six months after the most recent echo. Prior tests have included an MRI of my heart; now that was a treat! (I?m being somewhat sarcastic.)
Bottom line (and because I know many of you like the numbers): No real changes. Left ventricular and diastolic dimensions essentially unchanged. Mild left ventricular hypertrophy septum 1.3cm, posterior wall 1.3cm. Very mild aortic stenosis. 2-3+ AI. In his report to my doc, the cardiologist discusses ?an eccentric aortic insufficiency jet, yet it appears to be moderate to severe.? He adds that I have no enlargement of the ascending aorta. Measurements unchanged since March 21, 2005. No evidence of coronary insufficiency. Exercised on the treadmill for 11.5 minutes at a heart rate of 155.
To those of you who follow this kind of stuff very closely ? and I know some of you have had some very serious situations and I know you?re not doctors ? what does this sound like in the scheme of things? Because I tend to be very curious and hands on (and thanks to this site, very informed) my doc suggest I see a surgeon when I can just to get a surgeon?s viewpoint. We both actually thought the Cleveland Clinic would be great, though there are quite a few good surgeons in southern California. (Have any of you done the CC's e-second opinion?) Not sure if the CC is right, quite yet. My bigger question: Have many of you heard of this desire, by Mayo and perhaps others, to get in while you?re still asymptomatic?
Question 2: What role does good aerobic exercise, muscle strength, etc ? pre-surgery --have in recovery from surgery? The obvious answer is that the better the shape you?re in, the faster and easier the recovery. But in this case, does it really matter?
Question 3: I?m fearful of blood thinners, daily home monitoring, eliminating certain foods, red wine, etc. My doc says he tells his patients to ignore the food lists and just watch your INR levels. Still?.the Ross Procedure or other natural replacements sound preferable for my lifestyle. Am I too old for those. I realize, in the end, a surgeon will answer those questions.
Question 4: How long before many of you returned to work? My job doesn?t involve anything physically demanding. And have many you noticed serious memory problems post-surgery?
Again, thank all for reading. And to thanks to this site for existing.
I have several questions, but first I wanted to say that this site is terrific. It has helped ease any anxieties about the likelihood of surgery, which I suspect is sooner (as in a year or two) rather than later. Knowing what to expect is half the battle.
My story:
I?m a 55 year old male. The murmur was first detected when I was in my early 20s. I?ve been monitored every other year for most of those years in the various cities in which I have lived, including Chicago, New York and San Francisco (UCSF). Everybody has always told me I'll be in my 70s when this thing has to be replaced, if ever. Famous last words! (At least based on the many great stories from this forum.)
Mine is a bicuspid aortic valve, likely a deformity from birth. I?m in great shape. Exercise regularly on the Eliptical (40 minutes a stretch, 5-6 days a week.) Feel great. Low cholesterol. High blood pressure, but treated with multiple meds. Had a recent scare when my ankles started to swell; turns out it was likely the combo of Niaspan with a new blood pressure medicine. Doc wanted to do a stress echo to be sure. He had just returned from a meeting at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona, where the focus was on the need to start replacing valves on seemingly healthy, asymptomatic people. The idea, as I?ve read here, is to catch it before the heart is damaged. I?ve seen many of your comments on that. But there's early, and then there's early! This test was six months after the most recent echo. Prior tests have included an MRI of my heart; now that was a treat! (I?m being somewhat sarcastic.)
Bottom line (and because I know many of you like the numbers): No real changes. Left ventricular and diastolic dimensions essentially unchanged. Mild left ventricular hypertrophy septum 1.3cm, posterior wall 1.3cm. Very mild aortic stenosis. 2-3+ AI. In his report to my doc, the cardiologist discusses ?an eccentric aortic insufficiency jet, yet it appears to be moderate to severe.? He adds that I have no enlargement of the ascending aorta. Measurements unchanged since March 21, 2005. No evidence of coronary insufficiency. Exercised on the treadmill for 11.5 minutes at a heart rate of 155.
To those of you who follow this kind of stuff very closely ? and I know some of you have had some very serious situations and I know you?re not doctors ? what does this sound like in the scheme of things? Because I tend to be very curious and hands on (and thanks to this site, very informed) my doc suggest I see a surgeon when I can just to get a surgeon?s viewpoint. We both actually thought the Cleveland Clinic would be great, though there are quite a few good surgeons in southern California. (Have any of you done the CC's e-second opinion?) Not sure if the CC is right, quite yet. My bigger question: Have many of you heard of this desire, by Mayo and perhaps others, to get in while you?re still asymptomatic?
Question 2: What role does good aerobic exercise, muscle strength, etc ? pre-surgery --have in recovery from surgery? The obvious answer is that the better the shape you?re in, the faster and easier the recovery. But in this case, does it really matter?
Question 3: I?m fearful of blood thinners, daily home monitoring, eliminating certain foods, red wine, etc. My doc says he tells his patients to ignore the food lists and just watch your INR levels. Still?.the Ross Procedure or other natural replacements sound preferable for my lifestyle. Am I too old for those. I realize, in the end, a surgeon will answer those questions.
Question 4: How long before many of you returned to work? My job doesn?t involve anything physically demanding. And have many you noticed serious memory problems post-surgery?
Again, thank all for reading. And to thanks to this site for existing.