Right. I saw the month and day and didn't pay enough attention to the year. It looks like his immediate risks are reduced from a year ago, according to papers I've read.
Here are a couple general questions for the masses.
1) Are mitral valve clots considered more dangerous that throwing a clot from another valve?
2) Do newer bi-leaflet valves have less risk of forming a clot
I had a final meeting with the surgeon yesterday, and he seemed very concerned about the risk of surgery with the valve. I am not sure if it is because the valve is not his area of expertise, or if my risk is that much elevated over someone with a normal valve. He kind of scared me off a bit.
Perhaps your thoracic surgeon can send a copy of his source for that opinion to the plastic surgeon -- or perhaps they can pick up the phone and try to work this out.
.
I am blown away by hospital politics. My cardio communicated that he would recommend lovenox for a bridging, and my surgery was set in stone; the best part is insurance will cover 100%.
My thoracic surgeon sent a note to the plastic surgeon that stated lovenox is not recommended for valve recipients, and I would have to have a heparin bridge. The plastic surgeon said he would not do it under those circumstances. What BS
Kristen
After your procedure, did they start the lovenox back until your coumadin got back into range? It is so great you were able to do this.
Enter your email address to join: