Two years ago, in between my brother having an emergency mitral valve replacement and my sister MaryC and I having mitral valve repairs, I took my then 8 year old twins in to have their hearts checked out. I probably wouldn?t have done it, even with my family?s history, except that my son had commented several times about symptoms that gave me concern. As it turned out, he was diagnosed with MV prolapse and minimal leakage in the tricuspid valve, just as I have (had). My daughter did not have MVP, but they ?thought? it looked like she ?might? have the beginnings of MVP because one of the leaflets ?looked like? it wanted to billow. The doctor wanted to see them back in a year, but I waited two years.
I took them back yesterday for a two year check-up and the situation is virtually the same. He has, she ?almost has? (although the ?almost? sounds even more ?almost? this time!) a MVP. The doc wants to see them back in two years this time.
I, like most parents, want to do everything I can to watch out for my kids and keep them healthy. Two things I ponder and am concerned about. 1. They?re now marked for life as far as getting medical insurance coverage. There is really nothing I can do about that now. 2. What is the point in getting two year tests done on otherwise healthy children unless they start having symptoms?
I took them back yesterday for a two year check-up and the situation is virtually the same. He has, she ?almost has? (although the ?almost? sounds even more ?almost? this time!) a MVP. The doc wants to see them back in two years this time.
I, like most parents, want to do everything I can to watch out for my kids and keep them healthy. Two things I ponder and am concerned about. 1. They?re now marked for life as far as getting medical insurance coverage. There is really nothing I can do about that now. 2. What is the point in getting two year tests done on otherwise healthy children unless they start having symptoms?