On not waiting...
On not waiting...
Chilihead--
I'm not sure "too busy to let this thing slow me down right now" is a wise way to look at this situation. What damage to your heart happens in the next few weeks may take years to reverse. That's what my cardio told me.
Now, my situation is different than yours--you've obviously been watching this for awhile--and I can't remember now if you said your aortic insufficiency is because of stenosis or regurg--but: I never had a "heart condition" before last fall. No audible murmurs or any signs of my BAV, *ever.* Then it got infected, I got sick, my heart enlarged, and I had the valve fixed--all in under six weeks. At the time of my first-ever echo, (ordered because one doctor asked, "how long have you had this heart murmur?" and I said, "I don't have a heart murmur" and he said, "you do now--a big one") my AI was 4+, all regurg. Valve pretty much eaten away by the infection.
Before my heart ordeal, I was in excellent shape and my resting heart rate was ~65 BPM. After surgery, those first few anxious weeks, resting heart rate was +100 consistently. Not because of anxiety, but due entirely to some not-insignificant LVH and enlarged LV (as well as "diminished heart function"--my EF at last echo was calculated at 40-45) all of which developed in those six weeks I was sick.
I am now on beta-blockers, and still my resting pulse rarely dips below 78-82. And probably will be for the foreseeable future--cardio is not entirely certain that these conditions will reverse completely--but he's hopeful.
In any case, if I had had the luxury of a lot of foresight, I would have had this thing replaced at the first sign of trouble--granted I probably developed my significant valve leak much much faster than your condition is progressing, but--if your doctor is saying your heart is already enlarged, that says (to me) that you've already got a "condition" that will need to be regressed after your valve is fixed.
I'm sensitive to this because it appears that my Ross went textbook-smooth. In spite of my best efforts to be a complete hypochondriac at first and insist that the whole thing was going to go south at any moment, I keep getting told by my doctors that things could not possibly have gone better--both valves, the autograft and the new homograft are functioning perfectly.
Which means I'm left with residual "heart conditions" that developed in under two months as my valve started to leak. If I had had a clue I had heart trouble and that my "feeling unwell" was actually a raging endocarditis infection, I'd have been in the hospital faster than you could say "I DON'T WANT TO BE ON BETA BLOCKERS FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS."
Because I wouldn't be, if I had caught it.
YMMV, of course. And not to add to your already confusing array of stressors, I'm just telling you my experience. If a doctor had just told me, "your heart is already enlarged," I wouldn't be walking to the car tapping thorugh my palmpilot looking for an opportune date and putting off my surgery until it was convenient--if you've got business trips through october, then suddenly it's november and there are of course the holidays, with every reason you might feel like waiting until after the first of the year, blah blah blah. I didn't have the luxury of waiting, myself. It was do or die. And guess what--what was important, waited for me to recover--and what wasn't disappeared.
IMHO this isn't really something that should be made to wait. But like I said--your condition is probably not progressing as fast as mine did but you DID say you have an enlarged heart. I'm just sayin'.
Scott
, who hasn't posted in awhile cos I took a break from being "Scott, the heart patient" to forget about all of this for awhile...