pellicle
Professional Dingbat, Guru and Merkintologist
ouchnd he said "we now think the combination of insulin and statins causes calcification".
BTW were you at all BAV?
ouchnd he said "we now think the combination of insulin and statins causes calcification".
No.ouch
BTW were you at all BAV?
I could tell you a funny story about needing to help a mate with a BEV with a flat 12V lead acid battery... with jumper leads, using my PajeroBut I now have a BEV! (Battery Electric Vehicle!)
The clicking kinda worries me. I sleep on my side with my head/ear on a pillow. Maybe white noise, rain, or sleeping while hugging / smothering a pillow would help?
I completely agree with everything here. If I had stenosis and a smaller annulus (mine is about 29-33 depending on if you believe echo or CT) I would probably go with the data, go for a Ross with an experienced surgeon of course, and feel good about getting 20+ good quality, no clicking, no ACT years. Since I have regurgitation and a dilated annulus though, there is a much greater chance of it failing early which would mean more surgeries, sooner than I'd hope for. Since multiple surgeries are increasingly dangerous and complicated, mechanical is probably my best option and probably what I'll be going with. I am a bit worried about changes in lifestyle, but people who've had the mechanical seem to find it no big deal which is a big relief. Can I ask what your first OS was and why it failed?I am fairly recent Mech valve person, so I think that comments from the other forum participants are prob more valuable than mine.
We are similar in age. I am 41 and just had my second surgery (this time mech valve) in May.
When I had my first surgery (Mech valve was second), I was also pushing for Ross procedure. There is a couple of things that you need to be aware of:
1) Aortic annulus is an important risk factor for early failure of ross procedure. When I spoke to Prof. Hans Sievers, the leading Ross surgeon in Europe at the time, he said he will not do a ross on someone with Aortic annulus > 32mm. You can read the papers of Tirone David (the surgeon who invented the david procedure) and he says the same. Both Prof Sievers and Dr. David have some of the best ross outcomes at 20 years because they only selected patients who are optimal candidates for the procedue.
2) When the autograft does fail, there is no calcium because it is your own tissue. This means current TAVR cant be used for future replacement. There is something called a Jena TAVR valve that can sometimes be used in cases with pure regurgitation, but at present only used in very old and frail people in Europe. in the US, it is still in clinical trial. On the pulmonary homograft, transcatheter pulmonary replacement has a high incidence of endocarditis and not always possible. They tried to do this for Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2018, but then had to convert to full surgery because it failed.
Finally, a lot of doctors emphasize the positive success stories with Ross. But if things go wrong, they can really go wrong. Just look at Arnold Schwarzenegger: Ross in 1997. It failed the next day, so reop 24 hours later. Attempted transcatheter replacement of Pulmonary homograft in 2018 needed to be converted to full OHS. Transcatheter Aortic Valve replacement in 2020. He is only 72. Transcather valves only last 7-10 years. What then?
I think that the Ross can be a great operation, but the stats say people with only stenosis and normal aortic root/annulus have the best outcomes.
Anyways, I just wanted to share what I found through my research. Hopefully you find this helpful.
May I ask, have your surgeons told you about any delicacies with installing the mechanical valve in a large annulus? It seems to me that you are getting the valve only, without the aorta prosthesis (no Bentall), and annulus 33 is larger than most of the aortic valves. Sometimes surgeons use mitral valves in aortic positions in such cases.I completely agree with everything here. If I had stenosis and a smaller annulus (mine is about 29-33 depending on if you believe echo or CT) I would probably go with the data and go for a Ross. Since multiple surgeries are increasingly dangerous and complicated, mechanical is probably my best option and what I'll be going with. Can I ask what your first OS was and why it failed?
It would in fact be a Bentall. My ascending aorta is at about 45cm, so they want to be aggressive in order to prevent an aneurysm from developing down the roadMay I ask, have your surgeons told you about any delicacies with installing the mechanical valve in a large annulus? It seems to me that you are getting the valve only, without the aorta prosthesis (no Bentall), and annulus 33 is larger than most of the aortic valves. Sometimes surgeons use mitral valves in aortic positions in such cases.
Hi there,I completely agree with everything here. If I had stenosis and a smaller annulus (mine is about 29-33 depending on if you believe echo or CT) I would probably go with the data and go for a Ross. Since multiple surgeries are increasingly dangerous and complicated, mechanical is probably my best option and what I'll be going with. Can I ask what your first OS was and why it failed?
May I ask, have your surgeons told you about any delicacies with installing the mechanical valve in a large annulus? It seems to me that you are getting the valve only, without the aorta prosthesis (no Bentall), and annulus 33 is larger than most of the aortic valves. Sometimes surgeons use mitral valves in aortic positions in such cases.
Hi. I will try to answer below….Hi everyone. Long time lurker, but now things have gotten real. I have crossed into severe aortic regurgitation and will need a surgery that replaces the aortic valve and likely part of the aorta as well (bentall). Aiming to be butchered in early 2023.
As seems quite common, I am having the Ross vs mechanical debate in my head.
Instead of engaging in the debate which has been debated to death, I’d like to ask those of you with a mechanical valve a few questions so I can get a better sense of life on warfarin and with the valve. Feel free to answer as much as you want / have time for. Maybe this can even be a useful resource for prospective surgery patients faced with the same choice in the future. Would appreciate any responses I can get here or in a similar ross thread I am making for those who had that procedure. Thanks in advance!
1. At what age did you get your mechanical valve?
2. How long did you have / have you had your mechanical valve for?
3. If your valve failed, what was the reason?
4. Do you self manage your Warfarin, or go to a lab?
5. On a scale of 1-10, with 1 being annoying and 10 being no big deal, how would you rate the effect Warfarin has had on your day-to-day life?
6. Have you ever had a stroke or a significant bleed? If yes, why do you think this happened?
7. Has Warfarin caused any limitations with regards to supplements, antibiotics, or medicines?
8. Is it easy or risky to ‘bridge’ when you needed other medical procedures like a colonoscopy or other surgery? Have you ever had issues?
9. What are the ‘best practices’ with regards to alcohol and cannabis? Is it the same ‘dose what you ingest’ mentality as food? (I don’t drink or use cannabis daily, but once every week or 2 I enjoy a having most of a bottle of wine - or consuming an edible)
10. How often, if ever, is it necessary to go to the hospital for a fall or accident? Would you go if you fell skating or skiing? If you got hit in the head with a ball? What if you were in a car accident?
11. Do you feel you have any limits with regards to your heart beat? (I play squash and would want the freedom to get my heart rate to 180)
12. Did you ever lose sleep due to the clicking sound? How long before you got used to it?
13. On a scale of 1-10, with 1 being miserable and 10 being happy, how happy are you with your choice for mechanical valve?
14. Would you recommend someone in my shoes get a mechanical valve? (39 years old, severe regurgitation, bentall needed, dilated annulus and LV, can probably self manage INR responsibly, otherwise healthy, likes to travel, hike, eat everything, drink and consume a bit of cannabis occasionally, likes silence and might be irritated by the clicking).
Thanks in advance to everyone for the help in advance
1. 52 yrs oldHi everyone. Long time lurker, but now things have gotten real. I have crossed into severe aortic regurgitation and will need a surgery that replaces the aortic valve and likely part of the aorta as well (bentall). Aiming to be butchered in early 2023.
As seems quite common, I am having the Ross vs mechanical debate in my head.
Instead of engaging in the debate which has been debated to death, I’d like to ask those of you with a mechanical valve a few questions so I can get a better sense of life on warfarin and with the valve. Feel free to answer as much as you want / have time for. Maybe this can even be a useful resource for prospective surgery patients faced with the same choice in the future. Would appreciate any responses I can get here or in a similar ross thread I am making for those who had that procedure. Thanks in advance!
1. At what age did you get your mechanical valve?
2. How long did you have / have you had your mechanical valve for?
3. If your valve failed, what was the reason?
4. Do you self manage your Warfarin, or go to a lab?
5. On a scale of 1-10, with 1 being annoying and 10 being no big deal, how would you rate the effect Warfarin has had on your day-to-day life?
6. Have you ever had a stroke or a significant bleed? If yes, why do you think this happened?
7. Has Warfarin caused any limitations with regards to supplements, antibiotics, or medicines?
8. Is it easy or risky to ‘bridge’ when you needed other medical procedures like a colonoscopy or other surgery? Have you ever had issues?
9. What are the ‘best practices’ with regards to alcohol and cannabis? Is it the same ‘dose what you ingest’ mentality as food? (I don’t drink or use cannabis daily, but once every week or 2 I enjoy a having most of a bottle of wine - or consuming an edible)
10. How often, if ever, is it necessary to go to the hospital for a fall or accident? Would you go if you fell skating or skiing? If you got hit in the head with a ball? What if you were in a car accident?
11. Do you feel you have any limits with regards to your heart beat? (I play squash and would want the freedom to get my heart rate to 180)
12. Did you ever lose sleep due to the clicking sound? How long before you got used to it?
13. On a scale of 1-10, with 1 being miserable and 10 being happy, how happy are you with your choice for mechanical valve?
14. Would you recommend someone in my shoes get a mechanical valve? (39 years old, severe regurgitation, bentall needed, dilated annulus and LV, can probably self manage INR responsibly, otherwise healthy, likes to travel, hike, eat everything, drink and consume a bit of cannabis occasionally, likes silence and might be irritated by the clicking).
Thanks in advance to everyone for the help in advance
I hope this helps with making that more like a 55. I would say it has been an 8. I have lynch syndrome which makes me susceptible to different cancers. So I have to have procedures every year for surveillance. So I am on and off warfarin quite frequently.
Pellicle, good information to know for sure, Thank you.
I was wondering does the articles you referenced take into account the type of mechanical valve one has?
many have, its advertising jism and has no actual scientific basis. Indeed the fine print from On-X themselves is "to go with what evidence suits you" because one size does not fit all. Eg as this thread clarifies for a member here.... I have been told by my cardiologist that my valve, the On X is a superior valve in that the blood flow through the valve is less turbulent and therefore doesn’t damage the blood as easily as some other valves.
you could, but that would be risky in the longer term.... He has stated with my particular valve I could have a ACT therapy of 1.8 to 2.0
, however my clinic likes to keep me in the 2.0 to 3.0 range.
I self manage and test at home. I try to keep my range somewhere between 2.0 and 2.5.
agreed and the very basis of that post. Indeed 1.4 is the place where most surgeons will be comfortable to operate.... going down to 1.3-1.4 for a couple of days without warfarin isn’t that big of a deal is it?
so I may ask my cardiologist about the above article next time I see him before a procedure...
Enter your email address to join: