Mitral insufficiency is a peculiar problem. Often on echocardiography there may show significant leakage but clinically and on echo other parameters such as ventricular size may remain fairly stable for years. But when there are signs of deterioration then things to repair the problem should be done. One can surgically repair the valve or replace the valve or now possibly clip the valve. Then there is the decision of tissue vs mechanical. I was closely monitored for mitral insufficiency with echos every 6 to 12 months for years with only slow changes noted. Suddenly within a week I deteriorated severely. Going from biking 50 miles to marked shortness of breath going up a single flight of stairs.
I consulted with several top surgeons who both repaired and replaced. Basically repair was not thought to be likely since I already had had 3 open hearts for aortic valve and aneurysm repair. Doing something requiring another open heart should be as permanent as possible so no repair just replacement. But no one was feeling real warm and fuzzy about doing my surgery. They expected marked scarring which would make the surgery not fun.
I was aware of the mitral clip but I thought direct repair might be better.
I was on my way to one of the top mitral centers when I got a call from the head surgeon who surprised me and suggested I pursue getting the clip instead of surgery . I had already been evaluated for the clip and had told them I wanted surgery. But with the surgeon telling me to get the clip I went back to the clip cardiologist and luckily had the procedure done ASAP.
Spectacular results and a piece of cake from my perspective.
Returned to my previous level of fitness and went back on the bike.
I also had been for years been wrestling with AFib. Had three ablations with pretty good initial response for a few years but ultimately went into chronic A.Fib.
About two years after the clip my AFib spontaneously went away and I am in normal sinus rhythm. This maybe due to less strain on the left atrium from the decreased regurgitation . So for me the clip now in about 3 years has been fantastic. I am not sure right now what the specific criteria is for qualifying for the clip. Also it is technically challenging so a physician with a significant track record is important
I consulted with several top surgeons who both repaired and replaced. Basically repair was not thought to be likely since I already had had 3 open hearts for aortic valve and aneurysm repair. Doing something requiring another open heart should be as permanent as possible so no repair just replacement. But no one was feeling real warm and fuzzy about doing my surgery. They expected marked scarring which would make the surgery not fun.
I was aware of the mitral clip but I thought direct repair might be better.
I was on my way to one of the top mitral centers when I got a call from the head surgeon who surprised me and suggested I pursue getting the clip instead of surgery . I had already been evaluated for the clip and had told them I wanted surgery. But with the surgeon telling me to get the clip I went back to the clip cardiologist and luckily had the procedure done ASAP.
Spectacular results and a piece of cake from my perspective.
Returned to my previous level of fitness and went back on the bike.
I also had been for years been wrestling with AFib. Had three ablations with pretty good initial response for a few years but ultimately went into chronic A.Fib.
About two years after the clip my AFib spontaneously went away and I am in normal sinus rhythm. This maybe due to less strain on the left atrium from the decreased regurgitation . So for me the clip now in about 3 years has been fantastic. I am not sure right now what the specific criteria is for qualifying for the clip. Also it is technically challenging so a physician with a significant track record is important