Valve Choice
Valve Choice
I decided to go Mechanical due to my feeling that the Biologicals had limited life, and I did not want to have the threat of reoperation hanging over my head. Also, I did not want to have possible degraded performance that Biologicals might have in the later years of their life. Of course, the big drawback with Mechanicals is the anticoagulant, but I did not view that as a major obstacle. The facility where I was going to have my surgery used St Jude. I checked websites for St Jude, and the St Jude valve is impressive. Then, for my own education, I checked out the competitors on the Internet. I ruled all the competitors out for various reasons except for On-X. I researched On-X website extensively and compared it to St Jude. I decided that On-X was a better option for me. Some of this was my feeling that On-X has better engineering, some of it was just gut feeling. I was not acquainted with Valvereplacement.com at this point, so none of my decision was based on conversation with any other valve recipients. I had to schedule an appointment with my surgeon, and he was at first very reluctant to consider the On-X. I persisted, and he finally indicated that he would research it but would not guarantee that he would use On-X. This was good enough for me, as I felt that the St Jude was certainly a very good option. As it turned out, I got an On-X; i.e, the first On-X used at the facility where I got my valve. I had contacted On-X for some additional information on valve hemodynamics, which they provided. I did not contact St Jude as I did not need any additional information from them. So, to answer your question: I was influenced regarding valve choice almost entirely from Internet browsing of valve manufacturer's websites.