I think we probably handle the idea of heart surgery in our own unique ways.
I was 23 when a pre-med student heard my murmur -- all the doctors I had seen previously must have been deaf to it.
I was told that my valve will continue to fail, and that I'll probably need surgery in 20 years or so.
I had decades to get my head around it, and really didn't worry about it. I didn't have the Internet to throw me a lot of misinformation. I had to trust my doctors.
I was 41, had a good job, good insurance, and asked my cardiologist how sick I had to be before I can get my valve replaced. I was still relatively strong -- my chances for recovery were probably better than they would have been if I had waited. Also, surgeons were getting pretty good at this type of surgery, and had OR and follow-up teams that knew what they were doing.
If I learned that I needed a valve while in an E.R. after, perhaps, passing out, things may have cn different. If I heard that I'll need the surgery in a few weeks and shouldn't wait, my reaction (and fears) may have been a lot more panicked.
Don't necessarily trust Dr. Internet -- there's good stuff, and a bunch of garbage.
Many of us at this forum have been through similar challenges and can speak from experience
The higher rate is a result of valve implantations into old people -- the survival rates of these people was mixed in with overall survival rates for everyone with valve replacements (although I'm sure there are other studies that broke it down by age.
Now that they are doing TAVI and TAVR on older patients, we should see the overall survival rates for valve recipients rise and, not surprisingly, not so great survival rates for the people who are get the TAVx valve 'repairs.'
The TAVx procedures are good for older people whose surgical risks are high (although the surgery has been approved for a wider population). This procedure has its limitations - the repair doesn't last forever, and each time the procedure is repeated, the valve gets smaller and smaller. It's not ideal, but for many people it may be a better alternative to OHS.
I was 23 when a pre-med student heard my murmur -- all the doctors I had seen previously must have been deaf to it.
I was told that my valve will continue to fail, and that I'll probably need surgery in 20 years or so.
I had decades to get my head around it, and really didn't worry about it. I didn't have the Internet to throw me a lot of misinformation. I had to trust my doctors.
I was 41, had a good job, good insurance, and asked my cardiologist how sick I had to be before I can get my valve replaced. I was still relatively strong -- my chances for recovery were probably better than they would have been if I had waited. Also, surgeons were getting pretty good at this type of surgery, and had OR and follow-up teams that knew what they were doing.
If I learned that I needed a valve while in an E.R. after, perhaps, passing out, things may have cn different. If I heard that I'll need the surgery in a few weeks and shouldn't wait, my reaction (and fears) may have been a lot more panicked.
Don't necessarily trust Dr. Internet -- there's good stuff, and a bunch of garbage.
Many of us at this forum have been through similar challenges and can speak from experience
The survival rate for heart valve patients is likely to rise in the future.I'm 38, and just had a mechanical aortic valve put in. Second surgery, had a valve sparing aortic root replacement when I was 30. I also looked up life expectancy and was shocked when I saw how short it was, then I talked myself off the ledge. Math, the average age of heart valve patients is way older then I am. We are outliers.
The higher rate is a result of valve implantations into old people -- the survival rates of these people was mixed in with overall survival rates for everyone with valve replacements (although I'm sure there are other studies that broke it down by age.
Now that they are doing TAVI and TAVR on older patients, we should see the overall survival rates for valve recipients rise and, not surprisingly, not so great survival rates for the people who are get the TAVx valve 'repairs.'
The TAVx procedures are good for older people whose surgical risks are high (although the surgery has been approved for a wider population). This procedure has its limitations - the repair doesn't last forever, and each time the procedure is repeated, the valve gets smaller and smaller. It's not ideal, but for many people it may be a better alternative to OHS.