Ross
Well-known member
Well now, should I panic and skip 2 doses. I just tested 4.1. OMG I'm gonna explode!
Well now, should I panic and skip 2 doses. I just tested 4.1. OMG I'm gonna explode!
Statisticly, your Doc's are probably right, i.e. the chances of a stroke are small, BUT, we have 3 members who did suffer strokes with Low INR, one after 10 years on Coumadin, another just a few weeks Post Surgery, driving around with her husband who immediately took her to the ER which was most fortunate. (I wish I could remember her name... I'm thinking she is a black lady from Texas but the avitars have been removed from the Members List so I can't just scroll through to find her. I have a vivid memory of her picture).
Yes - but there's more. In addition to skipping the 2 doses - you send Lyn out to buy a big roll of bubble-wrap and some duct tape. Completely encase yourself in a cocoon of the wrap and tape (leaving only 1 finger sticking out for test). Stand completely still for 3 days, until you test again, so you don't risk a bleed. Once you test in range again, get a calico male stray cat (very rare), take it by the tail and swing it around your head 3 times. If the cat scratches you and you bleed, hold for another 2 days.
My range is 2.5-3.5. I don't do anything for a 4.1 (Just a CYA in case someone thinks I'm serious about the 2 day hold!0
Thanks for the followup Big Owl.
I'm not surprised about the German studies. I was aware that Europeans, especially Germans, tend to follow a lower dose protocol. By their standards, 1.7 or 1.8 is probably considered to be OK for Aortic Valves.
It's all a matter of Balancing Risks.
Most of us consider 2.0 to 4.0 to be the Safe Range and even 5.0 not something to be overly concerned about (i.e. do NOT HOLD a dose for 5.0 as many protocols suggest, just cut the dose in half for one day, then resume normal dosing and retest in 4 days or so). And, many (most?) of us prefer to be on the High Side of our Range for the reasons previously stated.
Statisticly, your Doc's are probably right, i.e. the chances of a stroke are small, BUT, we have 3 members who did suffer strokes with Low INR, one after 10 years on Coumadin, another just a few weeks Post Surgery, driving around with her husband who immediately took her to the ER which was most fortunate. (I wish I could remember her name... I'm thinking she is a black lady from Texas but the avitars have been removed from the Members List so I can't just scroll through to find her. I have a vivid memory of her picture).
Blanche's post is #31 in this thread. Unfortunately her Member Profile doesn't give the details of her husband's (another Al) stroke. It is buried somewhere in her thousands of posts...
Bottom Line: If you are the ONE in a 'whatever', the Statistics DO NOT Matter. That's why we like to take the old "Better to be Safe than Sorry" attitude.
'AL Capshaw'
In 2000, my husband had a serious problem with his INR. His INR was much too low, so after 10 years of successful anticoagulation he had a series of strokes.
After many weeks of hospitalization, physical and other therapy, when he returned home his anticoagulation was monitored by his Cardiologist and the Cardiologist's many partners... Al was to test weekly at the lab and he did. But, up jumped the devil when different doctors read his test results. His range, because of several strokes, was 3.0 -4.0. And that surely did confuse the hightly educated, experienced cardiologists in the practice.
Al's Cardiologist, the founding member of the practice and president of the practice, said Al's INR should be 3.0-4.0. Imagine my surprise when one of the doctors in his group said, "Have him hold for two days and test in a week>" He wanted Al to hold because his INR was 3.6...Another doctor wanted him to hold one dose because his range was too high...It was 3.0.
Years later, after the Cardiologist opened his own Coumadin Clinic at his (3) offices, he said...more than once...I don't know how the hell we didn't kill somebody before we got the monitor....
Currently, the largest practice in our area, with many more than 18 Cardiologists, many of which work at various hospitals, all use the very same "point of care testing" that is available to patients. And, they all still have their own ideas about the approptiate range for patients.
Just food for thought.
Blanche
One is that .7 is lower than anybody at my clinic would ever let me get.
Meanwhile does anyone have an answer as to why my uncle's docs are pushing vit. K daily and unlimited former "no-nos" now (I quoted his comment in a previous post)? Have I missed out on some new research?
Ross: this is the info from my uncle, which I've already posted twice in this thread (quite a while back now); it has nothing to do with my blog (that's just an essay on the misuse of language, including "blood thinning" for anticoagulation):
I also am on Coumadin - warfarin - with the same levels and I run pretty much OK with 22mg per week and get checked once a month but I've been on that crap for 10 years now. When I started I was told to "STAY AWAY'' from Vitamin K and that meant all the things I liked. Now they have changed their mind. Just last week I was told to get an over the counter 100 mcg Vitamin K and take one a day and eat all the good stuff again. I used to mix a little Vodka with my grapefruit juice but I doubt I will start that again. The last part was our usual familial monkeying around about "reasons to stay sloshed," but I found his experience interesting. Turns out that he's had a-fib for years and has kept within therapeutic range by following orders--and then new protocols appear. Suddenly everyone I know is on warfarin for one reason or another.
PS: the levels he's referring to are the same as mine: 2.5-3.5.
Enter your email address to join: