Hi
well, that's quite likely, I did however say what it seems to me to be like. This is just my opinion, I could be totally wrong.
this is a bit confusing, what do you mean that it lasts only 10% less?
Also, be careful that you do not confuse the longevity in elderly patients with younger patients. It makes a big difference how old you are when you have it. My homograft lasted me 20 years, but had I been 5 years younger when I got it the stats are that it would not have lasted as long.
Much of this is patient dependent and so projecting performance and durability with tissue valves is fraught.
I respect that each has their own opinions and I will not tell anyone about their choice or choices. Please do not confuse my willingness to argue the data with how I feel about any persons choice or their reasons.
PS: Firstly I'm not an expert (who here *is*) ... but from this study
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/123/1/31.long
Survival Comparison of the Ross Procedure and Mechanical Valve Replacement With Optimal Self-Management Anticoagulation Therapy
Propensity-Matched Cohort Study
so, short follow up times ...
So, 10 years and all good. My view is that were we to look at follow up of 30 years I am sure you'll find it quite hard to find the people in the Ross group, but you will find people in the Mechanical group.
Perhaps some people here will not be considering life in 30 years time, but as a 30year old I sure would.