G
Gemma
Hi Stephanie,
I think a lot of people have already hit the nail on the head - if you decide on the Ross procedure the most important thing is to find a good, confident, experienced surgeon who you feel comfortable with. My boyfriend Jim had a mechanical aortic valve replacement in December - the surgeon felt the Ross procedure was unsuitable, because in his opinion it gets more risky as the patient gets older, partly due to your pulmonary valve being under less pressure than the aortic and therefore possibly not coping in the aortic position. Also you've got 2 valves being operated on and potentially twice as many complications. However, this was just his personal opinion and obviously with his area of expertise, the mechanical valve was the way to go. (As Jim doesn't have to worry about getting pregnant, warfarin isn't an issue in that respect ) and Jim was happier with lifelong warfarin therapy (no problems so far - he still motorbikes, mountain bikes, swims, etc) than the definite need for re-operation in 15-20 years if he got a tissue valve.
Oh, also - we're in England - didn't have the opportunity to "shop around" for surgeons like you get in America - just went where Jim was referred. Very happy with the outcome, but it's interesting how countries vary in their approach to healthcare.
Good luck with your decision-making - whatever you choose will be right for you .
Gemma.
I think a lot of people have already hit the nail on the head - if you decide on the Ross procedure the most important thing is to find a good, confident, experienced surgeon who you feel comfortable with. My boyfriend Jim had a mechanical aortic valve replacement in December - the surgeon felt the Ross procedure was unsuitable, because in his opinion it gets more risky as the patient gets older, partly due to your pulmonary valve being under less pressure than the aortic and therefore possibly not coping in the aortic position. Also you've got 2 valves being operated on and potentially twice as many complications. However, this was just his personal opinion and obviously with his area of expertise, the mechanical valve was the way to go. (As Jim doesn't have to worry about getting pregnant, warfarin isn't an issue in that respect ) and Jim was happier with lifelong warfarin therapy (no problems so far - he still motorbikes, mountain bikes, swims, etc) than the definite need for re-operation in 15-20 years if he got a tissue valve.
Oh, also - we're in England - didn't have the opportunity to "shop around" for surgeons like you get in America - just went where Jim was referred. Very happy with the outcome, but it's interesting how countries vary in their approach to healthcare.
Good luck with your decision-making - whatever you choose will be right for you .
Gemma.