T
tex4ever54
Good luck Eddy
Good luck Eddy
Eddy:
Just to let you know again , that you are not alone. My surgery is about 10 days away and I am still in the process of deciding which valve to go with. I am 50 and at first I decided to go with a CE perimount magna valve based on the reasoning that I could get maybe 15 years of coumadin free life out of it. Plus by then surgical techniques will be greatly improved, possibly doing it via catheter. Oddly enough, yesterday I saw on the news where the worlds first valve replacement was done via catheter. I was excited because it confirmed the thinking that open heart surgery might not be needed for valve replacement in the future. Suddenly the thought struck me (and I could be wrong on this I am not a Dr.) so what! For those of us who will have valve replacements , tissue or mechanical implanted now, getting a new valve in is one thing, getting the OLD one out is a different thing. I just cannot conceptualize how the old valve would be explanted thru a catheter. Anyway, at this point, I have decided to go mechanical, specifically an On-X valve. The reasons being is that it has the HOPE of someday being OK'd for aspirin only anti-coag therapy and I just don't like the thought of going thru the process leading up to OHS again. There are ongoing tests in Europe and some completed in South Afrika that show great promise. You can go to www.mcri.com or www.onxvalves.com for more info on their product. I am rambling at this point so I will sign off and let the real experts on the board comment. God bless you!!
Good luck Eddy
edjspi said:Hello Everyone!
I am BRAND new to this site, and I'm sure there are other threads on this board that deal with this issue... but I wanted to put MY stoey out there and see if anyone could provide any advice, or better yet - experience that closely resembles my own.
I have a Bicuspid Aortic Valve, and Aortic Stenosis, diagnosed at age 5. I am 29 years old now. I have religiously followed my condition by making visits to the cardiologist every 6 months-1 year since the diagnosis. I have been with the cardiologist I have now for at least the last 10 years. at AGe 16 I underwent a Balloon Valvuloplasty to help the stenosis. it was successfull, although it left my AV with a leak. Basically this procedure put off my need for valve replacement for 13 years - as of today my trusted cardiologist has told me that now is the time for valve replacement surgery. We discussed this today after I had my second cardiac cath in 18 months today. One more note - I began having Atrial Fibrillation at age 19, and I currently take Flecanide (Tombocor) and Digoxin and Aspirin for that. for the most part I have no problems with the A-Fib now, as long as I take the medication.
Basically my question is this:
For someone my age (fairly young for a AV replacement surgery), should I go with the tissue or mechanical aortic valve replacement? I have discussed this with my cardiologist for years, and I have studied myelf about the pros and cons of each. here's how I see it:
Mechanical Valve:
-will last forever, but you bust take coumadin for the rest of your life
Tissue Value:
-no coumadin needed, but the valve will eventually wear out and need to be replaced, probably in 10-15 years.
other factors to consider:
1. Doc says that there are medications on the horizon that will replace coumadin, and these new meds do not require the consistent clotting tests that coumadin does
2. in 10-15 years when tissue valve wears out, they may then be doing valve replacements via catheder, so I can get a new valve without having another open heart surgery. and valve technology will surely have advanced by then too!
3. possibility that I could be left with A-fib after the VR surgery (doc says 30% do), meaning I may need to be on coumadin for that, so if I get a mechanical valve, I could still need to be on coumadin!!
4. I have heard and read reports of mechancal valves and their 'clicking' noise, and people regretting the mechanical value choice because of this. doc says that this was an issue in the past, but the latest generation of valves do NOT have a clicking noise that will annoy you, but rather can only be heard by putting an ear to the chest or stethoscope.
almost everyone I ask (my cardio doc, nurse, friends who workat cardio hosptials) how many get tissue and how many mechanical, tell me that it's about 50/50
If anyone out there near my age group has has this done and can tell me their experience, I would greatly appreciate it. I am having a tough time finding people my age that have gone through this decision!! Or even if you haven't had the experience but can shed some light on this subject that would be great too! AND, if anyone can provide me with more specifics on what I can expect for recovery - please do. and please take into consideration that I am a healthy, active, 29-year-old male who is always on the go. my music career is very demanding (live performances, on the road, etc), so I'd like to know when I can expect to return to that.
thanks in advnace for your help, and I promise future posts won't be this long!!! please feel free to email me also. I'm off to do more searhcing through threads
thanks,
Eddie
Eddy:
Just to let you know again , that you are not alone. My surgery is about 10 days away and I am still in the process of deciding which valve to go with. I am 50 and at first I decided to go with a CE perimount magna valve based on the reasoning that I could get maybe 15 years of coumadin free life out of it. Plus by then surgical techniques will be greatly improved, possibly doing it via catheter. Oddly enough, yesterday I saw on the news where the worlds first valve replacement was done via catheter. I was excited because it confirmed the thinking that open heart surgery might not be needed for valve replacement in the future. Suddenly the thought struck me (and I could be wrong on this I am not a Dr.) so what! For those of us who will have valve replacements , tissue or mechanical implanted now, getting a new valve in is one thing, getting the OLD one out is a different thing. I just cannot conceptualize how the old valve would be explanted thru a catheter. Anyway, at this point, I have decided to go mechanical, specifically an On-X valve. The reasons being is that it has the HOPE of someday being OK'd for aspirin only anti-coag therapy and I just don't like the thought of going thru the process leading up to OHS again. There are ongoing tests in Europe and some completed in South Afrika that show great promise. You can go to www.mcri.com or www.onxvalves.com for more info on their product. I am rambling at this point so I will sign off and let the real experts on the board comment. God bless you!!