P
PapaHappyStar
Natanni said:Thank You Burair for posting this survey!! It would be interesting to do another as well, patients with BAV and their parents heart history;
I voted for Nathan, and our daughter has a 'suspicious' murmur, and they are treating her now as though she is bicuspid until proven otherwise so I voted her as being suspected. She has an appt for an echo in June by her Dad's doc. We have one son with no heart murmur.
I think it would be a good idea -- would increase the statistics, but the errors ( due to incorrect diagnosis -- and perhaps also some due to incorrect projection in retrospect ) might be larger.
Not that we are concerned with accuracy here ( we really cant be
The result as of this point is 2 out of 9 BAV parents have kids with BAV -- thats 22%, a whole order more than the 1 to 2% in the general population ( even discounting multiple kids with BAV in one family ). This paper:
Cripe L, Andelfinger G, Martin LJ, Shooner K, Benson DW Bicuspid aortic valve is heritable. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jul 7;44(1):138-43.
says their sample gives them a 24% prevalence. They dont differentiate between the sex of the parent and their hypothesis about the genetics of BAV is: varied genes produce BAV, and they construct their model using this hypothesis. I am no geneticist but I think there might be a simpler cause of BAV formation ( or perhaps a few simple ones ).
Also interesting in this poll is fyrfytr's message about one of his sons having MVP ( mitral valve prolapse ). The paper above links an increase in the occurance of other CVM ( cardiovascular malformation ) with the presense of BAV in the family.
Pretty interesting what you can find even with such limited statistics ( although we may have got a bit lucky with the way some of the numbers have panned out so far )