shanwow1
Active member
Hello again,
I posted for the first time last week, thanks again for the warm welcome. I had my appointment with my new cardiologist yesterday, my first follow-up since moving to Vancouver from Edmonton in January. The doctor was great and really helped me understand my diagnosis in a way I have never heard before. I have a Bicuspid Aortic valve with no stenosis but severe insufficiency (regurgitation). We spent a lot of time going over the progression of my symptoms over the last year and although the symptoms have come on slowly, the more I think about it and talk about it, I do feel that there is marked difference in my health from even 6 months ago. Based on my symptoms of decreased exercise tolerance, shortness of breath on exertion and increased length of palpitations, coupled with the fact that my regurgitation is now solidly at the severe level, it looks like surgery will be happening in the next year or 2. I did find some comedy in the situation, as the cardiologist kept using the word "intervene" as a synonym for surgery, which for some reason makes me picture sitting down with my valve and having a stern talk with it to tell it to smarten up! The cardiologist will be scheduling an MRI to see if my heart has enlarged since my last MRI in 2011, which will be the confirmation that surgery is required imminently. She also wants a stress test to confirm my symptoms on exertion, and to see me again in 3 months. She also briefly mentioned the valve options, and I mentioned that I thought mechanical was the obvious choice for someone my age (26). I was surprised to hear that this isn't exactly a given, and that tissue valves have been improved to expect 10-15 years even for someone so young, and that valve in valve surgeries through the groin are becoming more and more common for when the tissue valve does inevitably fail. She didn't mention the possibility of repair, so that is something I would inquire about next time.
I was a bit upset afterwards, but overall I feel like I was prepared for this scenario, and I feel positive about the high success rate of the surgery. I think I am hoping that the MRI doesn't show too much enlargement so that I can wait another 3-6 months and hopefully be back in Edmonton where we have a larger support system.
One positive thing I found out was that I show no signs of aortic aneurysm or enlargement, which I was concerned about given my family history. I know there is a possibility that I could develop this later on, but for now it's one thing at a time. I also learned that in addition to my pseudocoarctation of the descending aortic arch, I also have an aberrant left subclavian artery. Neither of these things are contributing to my condition currently but it is interesting that my plumbing is a little different in addition to my BAV. Anyone else on here with funky anomalies like that?
Anyways, thanks for reading, it's nice to have a place where I can just share, as well as ask questions.
I posted for the first time last week, thanks again for the warm welcome. I had my appointment with my new cardiologist yesterday, my first follow-up since moving to Vancouver from Edmonton in January. The doctor was great and really helped me understand my diagnosis in a way I have never heard before. I have a Bicuspid Aortic valve with no stenosis but severe insufficiency (regurgitation). We spent a lot of time going over the progression of my symptoms over the last year and although the symptoms have come on slowly, the more I think about it and talk about it, I do feel that there is marked difference in my health from even 6 months ago. Based on my symptoms of decreased exercise tolerance, shortness of breath on exertion and increased length of palpitations, coupled with the fact that my regurgitation is now solidly at the severe level, it looks like surgery will be happening in the next year or 2. I did find some comedy in the situation, as the cardiologist kept using the word "intervene" as a synonym for surgery, which for some reason makes me picture sitting down with my valve and having a stern talk with it to tell it to smarten up! The cardiologist will be scheduling an MRI to see if my heart has enlarged since my last MRI in 2011, which will be the confirmation that surgery is required imminently. She also wants a stress test to confirm my symptoms on exertion, and to see me again in 3 months. She also briefly mentioned the valve options, and I mentioned that I thought mechanical was the obvious choice for someone my age (26). I was surprised to hear that this isn't exactly a given, and that tissue valves have been improved to expect 10-15 years even for someone so young, and that valve in valve surgeries through the groin are becoming more and more common for when the tissue valve does inevitably fail. She didn't mention the possibility of repair, so that is something I would inquire about next time.
I was a bit upset afterwards, but overall I feel like I was prepared for this scenario, and I feel positive about the high success rate of the surgery. I think I am hoping that the MRI doesn't show too much enlargement so that I can wait another 3-6 months and hopefully be back in Edmonton where we have a larger support system.
One positive thing I found out was that I show no signs of aortic aneurysm or enlargement, which I was concerned about given my family history. I know there is a possibility that I could develop this later on, but for now it's one thing at a time. I also learned that in addition to my pseudocoarctation of the descending aortic arch, I also have an aberrant left subclavian artery. Neither of these things are contributing to my condition currently but it is interesting that my plumbing is a little different in addition to my BAV. Anyone else on here with funky anomalies like that?
Anyways, thanks for reading, it's nice to have a place where I can just share, as well as ask questions.