pellicle
Professional Dingbat, Guru and Merkintologist
very kindthinking
very kindthinking
I was just quoting their words.very kind
Get bio then tavr if you are a good candidateHi !, before all, would like to thank all the people that share here their concerns and thoughts about this event that has crossed our lives taking us to surgery room to have a heart valve replaced.
currently am 62, and every where hear "recommendations" for tissue valves because they will last 20 years, or 17 at least, and on the other side hear that currnet st jude and on-x valves will for sure last 20+ years and warfarin is just a matter of learning how to manage it....
reading and talking have to say a question comes to my mind "if there is no one walking around with a pericardial valve" x 20 years, how can the industry promiss so ?, statistics can say what ever you push the to say, mathematics tell you is all about the sample and the population selected,
so "science papers" mean certain thing but they are just a "reflection" of the reality,..... but there are people walking around with mechanical valves x 20+ years ...
all of that said, still have doubts, will a pericardial valve last 20 years on a 62 years old ?
is taking warfaring the boogie man that will fix one thing and destroy 3 more ?
what about the noise of the mechanical valves ?, st jude or on-x ?
my heart tells me to get a bio, my mind tells me to get a robot l.o.l...
just need to share.....
thank you
hi there i`m having a valve replacement in 2 weeks what did you decide on the day of your surgery and do you have any regrets thanksGet bio then tavr if you are a good candidate
Clearly, the stuff on the internet is timeless!Uhm, this post was started in September 2015.
That's good to hear. I'm turning 62 next month and I still haven't had my valve implanted both my surges in America and in Thailand where I live are both recommending tissue valve without me saying anything also talking about doing minimally invasive surgeryjlcsn - Some of the valve lifespan expectancies are extrapolations from data regarding the previous generations of tissue valves. IIRC, the current batch of tissue valves are thought of as "third-generation" valves. The scientists have a lot of data on the "second-generation" valves that were in use some years ago. They also have predictions as to how the third-generation valves are superior to the second. They then calculate how long the third generation valves should last, given what they know about second generation and what they think they know about the third generation valves. We know and are told by the docs that there are no guarantees as to valve life, but they do tell us that their best prediction is that the third-generation valves will last longer than the second gen. They have a lot of data about what percentage of second generation valves are still OK at 10, 12, 15 or more years, and they expect that the newest ones will last longer.
They are also sure that the older the patient at time of implant, the longer it will take for calcification to form on the prosthetic valve. That is because the immune system is what causes calcification, and the immune systems of younger patients are more active than those of older patients.
I was 63 when my Edwards tissue valve was implanted. At 4 1/2 years all is just fine. I'm betting that it will be a close race as to which lasts longer -- me or my valve. (And yes, I DO buy green bananas. . . )
My bovine valve lasted 13 years, even though they said up to 20 years. Everybody is a bit different though. So when my bovine started to fail I opted for a mechanical, that was when I was 59 years old. My bovine went on at age 46. I am now 62.Hi !, before all, would like to thank all the people that share here their concerns and thoughts about this event that has crossed our lives taking us to surgery room to have a heart valve replaced.
currently am 62, and every where hear "recommendations" for tissue valves because they will last 20 years, or 17 at least, and on the other side hear that currnet st jude and on-x valves will for sure last 20+ years and warfarin is just a matter of learning how to manage it....
reading and talking have to say a question comes to my mind "if there is no one walking around with a pericardial valve" x 20 years, how can the industry promiss so ?, statistics can say what ever you push the to say, mathematics tell you is all about the sample and the population selected,
so "science papers" mean certain thing but they are just a "reflection" of the reality,..... but there are people walking around with mechanical valves x 20+ years ...
all of that said, still have doubts, will a pericardial valve last 20 years on a 62 years old ?
is taking warfaring the boogie man that will fix one thing and destroy 3 more ?
what about the noise of the mechanical valves ?, st jude or on-x ?
my heart tells me to get a bio, my mind tells me to get a robot l.o.l...
just need to share.....
thank you
It's frightening cuz we have to have the valve to live so if it fails you've got to go through another resurgery I'm assuming I'll do the valve it's 62 or 63 that would probably take me into my mid 70s then do valve and valve but of course there's always the possibility of ohsMy bovine valve lasted 13 years, even though they said up to 20 years. Everybody is a bit different though. So when my bovine started to fail I opted for a mechanical, that was when I was 59 years old. My bovine went on at age 46. I am now 62.
You did well to get 13 years. At age 46, getting 13 years from a tissue valve is better than average. About 10 is more typical.My bovine valve lasted 13 years, even though they said up to 20 years. Everybody is a bit different though. So when my bovine started to fail I opted for a mechanical, that was when I was 59 years old. My bovine went on at age 46. I am now 62.
13 years isn't unexpected from a bovine in a 46yo.My bovine valve lasted 13 years, even though they said up to 20 years. ...My bovine went on at age 46.
Enter your email address to join: