Ah, sorry I didn’t catch that. i hope I didn’t confuse the situationMaybe he's talking about a TAVR, since he's 71? My doctor told me TAVR last 5 years and good results up to 10 years, but after that, the data isn't there yet.
Ah, sorry I didn’t catch that. i hope I didn’t confuse the situationMaybe he's talking about a TAVR, since he's 71? My doctor told me TAVR last 5 years and good results up to 10 years, but after that, the data isn't there yet.
I think providing information and/or dispelling misinformation is all this forum is designed to do. All artificial heart valves are "fixes".....they are not "cures" and I hope the information we share helps point the patient in a direction that best solves his, or her problem..........But the main takeaway from all this is, now, I feel I can give bio an honest consideration; you've all given me great confidence on judging both mechanic and bio equally.
PS To EVERYBODY who posts in here, I've learned soooo much, with the links to medical reports, personal experiences, etc.; thanks to all of you for helping me wade into this with more knowledge.
Hi macdaddy - The Inspiris Resilia valve is just the latest valve to be produced by Edwards Lifesciences. You’ll see in my bio below that my aortic valve is an Edwards Magna Ease valve. The Edwards Magna Ease was the latest aortic valve to be in production when I had my AVR, two or three years later the Inspiris Resilia was produced - it has been treated with something to make it last longer than the previous generation of valves such as mine.Since I done in here, I'll just ask...anyone who can assist me with familiarization of my bio options; well....I'd really appreciate that input.
Hi Paleowoman,Hi macdaddy - The Inspiris Resilia valve is just the latest valve to be produced by Edwards Lifesciences. You’ll see in my bio below that my aortic valve is an Edwards Magna Ease valve. The Edwards Magna Ease was the latest aortic valve to be in production when I had my AVR, two or three years later the Inspiris Resilia was produced - it has been treated with something to make it last longer than the previous generation of valves such as mine.
Good luck on the surgery and the job interview. Just hang in there.Hi Paleowoman,
Thank you for this information. I was just reading a report on the Resilia treatment, no real good long-term data, as it's not been out here in America for all that long...but it sounded promising. I have my first appointment with the surgeon referred to me by my cardiologist and I'll report back in here when that's completed.
LOL, I have a job interview immediatly afterwards, hope I can get my head back in the game for that.
Thanks again to everyone.
Mooo.... Good on ya!They said it wouldn’t last, but 18 years later my Edwards Magna Perimount is still working well. I was 52 when Dr. Kouchoukos replaced my stenotic aortic valve. There has been little to no change over the years. I hope everyone who undergoes replacement will have the same good fortune.
At age 71, that is a good choice. Bio valves tend to last longer in older patients, over 65, than for younger patients and it very well could be your last. You mentioned that they are recommending an Edwards valve, but not the Resilia. I'd guess that they will give you a Magna Ease, which has a long track record of doing well in patients over 65.I'm beginning to settle in on a Bio,
Yes, the he Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease is what he mentioned as their preferred go-to for my situation. Everyone in here is so knowledeable; it's great to have this resource, and the community is great! Thank you for your input.At age 71, that is a good choice. Bio valves tend to last longer in older patients, over 65, than for younger patients and it very well could be your last. You mentioned that they are recommending an Edwards valve, but not the Resilia. I'd guess that they will give you a Magna Ease, which has a long track record of doing well in patients over 65.
Even though it does not have a very long track record, I think that the Resilia valve remains a decent for younger patients who choose tissue. A bit of a gamble, but the anti-calcification treatment could cause the valve to last longer before SVD, so a risk/reward decision that some feel is worth it. But, for someone who is 71, in my view best to stick with the one with the longer track record. A friend who was 66 at the time of his surgery was recommended the Magna Ease over the Resilia for the same reason at the Cleveland Clinic.
The thing to also take account of is that if the cardiac surgeon hasn't had experience of inserting a new valve like the Resilia, as the surgeon you saw said, that may be the main reason they will go with the older valve as it's very important that your cardiac surgeon has experience with inserting a particular valve.Yes, the he Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease is what he mentioned as their preferred go-to for my situation. Everyone in here is so knowledeable; it's great to have this resource, and the community is great! Thank you for your input.
He didn't mention not having trained on the Resilia, but said he'd need special permission from the hospital to use that device. He said his group has done one Resilia under special permission; but also said the manufacturers are always touting the latest and greatest treatments to the tissues, but the longest study on the Resilia was for only 7.7 years. I'm comfortable with the Magna, and he was quite confident in it as well. Who knows what happens between now and my next visit, they could do a 180 and be recommending it. Time will tell. Thanks so much for you input.The thing to also take account of is that if the cardiac surgeon hasn't had experience of inserting a new valve like the Resilia, as the surgeon you saw said, that may be the main reason they will go with the older valve as it's very important that your cardiac surgeon has experience with inserting a particular valve.
I had two surgical consults with my surgeon before surgery. In the first consult I was heavily leaning towards tissue and discussed the Resilia, as at age 53 this would have been my preferred choice if I was going tissue. My surgeon was involved as a consultant in the design of the Resilia. He said that he expects it to last at least as long as the Magna Ease, but until you know, you don't know to a certainty. Also, he mentioned that the platform used for the Resilia was essentially the same as the Magna, so one would not expect any needed learning curve for a surgeon to install if they had done any Magna Ease and I would expect virtually all valve surgeons today to be experienced in installing the Magna. Besides changing how the bovine tissue is treated, meant to delay SVD, the Resilia also has a ring which expands a little, in order to better accomodate a future TAVI if needed and if the patient is qualified. This expandable ring was added to the Resilia design based on the input from my surgeon in his consultant role with Edwards.He didn't mention not having trained on the Resilia, but said he'd need special permission from the hospital to use that device. He said his group has done one Resilia under special permission; but also said the manufacturers are always touting the latest and greatest treatments to the tissues, but the longest study on the Resilia was for only 7.7 years. I'm comfortable with the Magna, and he was quite confident in it as well. Who knows what happens between now and my next visit, they could do a 180 and be recommending it. Time will tell. Thanks so much for you input.
Congratulations!!!Mooo.... Good on ya!
That's very interesting. I did see the expandable ring feature in the Resilia, but didn't realize it was there to allow for a potentially larger valve-in-valve at a later date. Sounds like you were lucky to have such a valued surgeon; hope mine goes as well, when the time comes. Thank you so much for your input.I had two surgical consults with my surgeon before surgery. In the first consult I was heavily leaning towards tissue and discussed the Resilia, as at age 53 this would have been my preferred choice if I was going tissue. My surgeon was involved as a consultant in the design of the Resilia. He said that he expects it to last at least as long as the Magna Ease, but until you know, you don't know to a certainty. Also, he mentioned that the platform used for the Resilia was essentially the same as the Magna, so one would not expect any needed learning curve for a surgeon to install if they had done any Magna Ease and I would expect virtually all valve surgeons today to be experienced in installing the Magna. Besides changing how the bovine tissue is treated, meant to delay SVD, the Resilia also has a ring which expands a little, in order to better accomodate a future TAVI if needed and if the patient is qualified. This expandable ring was added to the Resilia design based on the input from my surgeon in his consultant role with Edwards.
Happy to share my happy experience! It’s a Model 3000Duffey, I am very "heart"ened to hear that. I had the same valve put in 12 years ago. So far, no issues; so much so that I even forget my valve-anniversary days. I will be very thankful if mine lasts as long as well. Fingers Crossed. May I ask what model is yours? Wish you continued success with your health ! Thank You for sharing your information.
You’re not mistaken. It’s both. TAVR is a special procedure that can only be done with a particular product that is designed to be installed that way. The valve has to be able to be collapsed to thread into place through a blood vessel, then expanded once there.I thought TAVR was a technique, not a product, but now it appears I'm mistaken???
Thanks!Such great news Duffey. Here to many more!
Enter your email address to join: