Elcarim
Well-known member
This is a question that haunts me. I am fairly young (30yo) and have a mechanical aortic valve and pacemaker. I know that there will probably be many advancements made in my lifetime regarding my condition.
Reading the thread about valves being grown from stem cells has prompted this post. I wonder if, after surviving two AVRs already, I would put my hand up for another if it meant I could have a 'natural' valve and be off the coumadin.
How would the risks weigh up? Perhaps if they could fix my pacing node and remove the need for the pacemaker also..? But what if there was yet more damage from another surgery? What if this time I got a lethal infection or had a stroke?
And how would it feel to go from being a person with a chronic medical condition to being a normal person again with no artificial parts? Would it be an easy transition? Or would it be as disturbing as becoming a 'heart patient' was in the first place?
Do others with mechanical valves think about this?
Reading the thread about valves being grown from stem cells has prompted this post. I wonder if, after surviving two AVRs already, I would put my hand up for another if it meant I could have a 'natural' valve and be off the coumadin.
How would the risks weigh up? Perhaps if they could fix my pacing node and remove the need for the pacemaker also..? But what if there was yet more damage from another surgery? What if this time I got a lethal infection or had a stroke?
And how would it feel to go from being a person with a chronic medical condition to being a normal person again with no artificial parts? Would it be an easy transition? Or would it be as disturbing as becoming a 'heart patient' was in the first place?
Do others with mechanical valves think about this?