pellicle
Professional Dingbat, Guru and Merkintologist
Just an observation:
this underscores my usual views that "you can't rely on scans to tell you everything" (because medical diagnostic imaging just isn't that accurate yet), and "why its important for the surgeon to actually see things"
also, that rate of decay you mentioned is usually non linear. So it may be 0.12cm per year at first and progress to 0.2cm per year later
FredW;n866606 said:...
More details about the valve: Fred's valve had three leaflets (not bicuspid as they thought previously), lots of calcification, and was replaced by a "trifecta gt" valve by St Jude's.
this underscores my usual views that "you can't rely on scans to tell you everything" (because medical diagnostic imaging just isn't that accurate yet), and "why its important for the surgeon to actually see things"
also, that rate of decay you mentioned is usually non linear. So it may be 0.12cm per year at first and progress to 0.2cm per year later