Patrian
New member
Well... I was posting on here for my last surgery, aortic root and valve replacement with Edwards 3000 bovine valve. This was in 2007 or 2008... 6 years ago. My has the forum changed! I couldn't even locate my old username... maybe it's the new forum software?
Everything has been perfect since... In fact my recovery was amazing... driving in 3 weeks... back to normal in 6. Of course I was 27 then.
I have been confirmed with endocarditis on my valve with blood cultures and a TEE. It was a bit hard to detect because it is Staph epidermis which is luckily not very mean, but unfortunately sticky. I failed 6 weeks of vanc only, and am now on a mix of three... I have had to large blood clots as a result in my arteries that feed into my leg, one resulting in surgery to remove. I have been referred to Dr. Gonzales-Stawinski, formerly at Cleveland Clinic, now at Baylor university Medical Center in Dallas. He is supposed to be one of the best at difficult re-ops on valves. I am a bit concerned with his recommendation.. that is a full single peiece homograft root and valve. I am concerned about the long term durability, or lack thereof (remember I am 33 and this will be my third OHS). When asked about this, his thoughts are that homografts are proven resistant to reinfection compared to everything else AND that recent improvements in cath valve procedures would mean that in 5-10 years, my next surgery would be done without cracking the chest... This makes since, still I wonder if this is best.
The team is giving me a lower than usual mortality (10% versus 20%-30%) for this surgery as I have no other symptoms, am not sick, have not been sick, and am in good health with no other health issues.
This being said, I am less concerned about the actual surgery as I am the prospects of another infection and re-op... The cath options sounds good next time around, but this is only an option if the homograft root stay strong while the valve fails.
Any thoughts or experiences with this subject?
Thanks!
Oh, April 8th is the date for me... surgery #3... first was repair at age 5 (don't remember a thing) and 2nd was 2007
Everything has been perfect since... In fact my recovery was amazing... driving in 3 weeks... back to normal in 6. Of course I was 27 then.
I have been confirmed with endocarditis on my valve with blood cultures and a TEE. It was a bit hard to detect because it is Staph epidermis which is luckily not very mean, but unfortunately sticky. I failed 6 weeks of vanc only, and am now on a mix of three... I have had to large blood clots as a result in my arteries that feed into my leg, one resulting in surgery to remove. I have been referred to Dr. Gonzales-Stawinski, formerly at Cleveland Clinic, now at Baylor university Medical Center in Dallas. He is supposed to be one of the best at difficult re-ops on valves. I am a bit concerned with his recommendation.. that is a full single peiece homograft root and valve. I am concerned about the long term durability, or lack thereof (remember I am 33 and this will be my third OHS). When asked about this, his thoughts are that homografts are proven resistant to reinfection compared to everything else AND that recent improvements in cath valve procedures would mean that in 5-10 years, my next surgery would be done without cracking the chest... This makes since, still I wonder if this is best.
The team is giving me a lower than usual mortality (10% versus 20%-30%) for this surgery as I have no other symptoms, am not sick, have not been sick, and am in good health with no other health issues.
This being said, I am less concerned about the actual surgery as I am the prospects of another infection and re-op... The cath options sounds good next time around, but this is only an option if the homograft root stay strong while the valve fails.
Any thoughts or experiences with this subject?
Thanks!
Oh, April 8th is the date for me... surgery #3... first was repair at age 5 (don't remember a thing) and 2nd was 2007