I had a mini-sternotomy. Instead of the full cut, they cut about 3.5 inches at the top of my sternum. Having said that, I would now say that I am probably more in the camp that a full sternotomy is better, in order for the surgeon to have better access and less time on the heart and lung machine. The less invasive procedures have shown to require longer operating times and more time on the heart and lung machine, which is not a good thing. The advantage of the mini was that my wound healed faster, but it really did not help me get back to sports any quicker. The limiting factor for that is the healing which needs to occur in the heart from being sliced and sutured. The mini procedures don't help with that. Not talking about TAVI, to be clear.
I should add that when I made that call, the anesthesia had worn off enough that I had some mental clarity, but not so much that I yet felt any pain. About 3 hours later, it had worn off to the point that some pain was kicking in and I would not have wanted to make any calls at that point.