Agian
Well-known member
Someone on the forum recently raised pannus as an issue. I wonder how common it is.
Someone on the forum recently raised pannus as an issue. I wonder how common it is.
Pannus and thrombosis may be present alone or in combination and cause acute or subacute valve obstruction. The incidence of obstructive valve thrombosis varies between 0.3% and 1.3% per patient-year in patients with mechanical valves.50,63
.Of 63% of patients in whom coagulation variables were available at the time of obstruction, 70% were receiving inadequate anticoagulant therapy. In 63% of the procedures the patient was in New York Heart Association functional class IV
hi john, do your homework and make your choice, which ever valve you choose has no life time promise,but mech is the best choice on that score to last longer, there have been a few on here with mechs who have needed re ops,its a tough choice and remember there is no bad choice, personally i didnt want to be on warfarin and the problems that can occur with it, so i choose tissue and am very happy with that,but you are younger so you have got to put that into the mix, am sure you will make the right decision,
That was my #1 reason for going mechanical, as I had already suffered from CHF before the valve replacement.if I did want to go tissue, but I can't imagine having the feeling of a valve wearing out again with all the associated symptoms.
First off Hi, John I'm srry to hear you needed surgery now, On the plus side you go to one of the very best centers for heart surgeries. also At least you have had a year to consider your choices, I personally would go with whatever your "gut" feeling is telling you. If the thought of a tissue valve and most likely chance of at least one more Open Heart surgery , and the risk of morbitity and mortality that go along with each surgery gives you more peace than the thoughts of decades on Coumadin or whatever anticoagulant MAY be available in the coming decades. then I would go with your gut feeling and get a tissue valve.
On the other hand if you rather the risks (and there ARE risks even in well managed patients) from choosing a mech valve and hopefully avoid a REDO and the risks of clots and bleeds that go along with that instead of the risk of repeat surgeries when it needs replaced, than I'd go mechanical. You are not necessarily signing your self up for muliple surgeries, IF you choose a tissue valve now when it needs replaced (the odds are very high you will out live a tissue valve considerring your age) then you will make the choice then baseed on what is available to you when the time comes.,,,maybe you will choose mech then..again maybe not.
Most everything you read here are just opinions from non medical people and you can find bad results which ever way you look, yes there are younger or older people whose tissue valve need replaced much sooner than they hoped, wether because the valve calcified or the surgeon put too small a valve in, or their valve is doing ok but they have an annuerysm it and some people who choose tissue valves do end up on long term coumadin- altho to be honest I dont remember that many from the members here, there used to be a poll, it happens.
There are also people here who chose mechanical to hopefully avoid any more heart surgeries who needed them anyway, because of pannus or clots or too many bleeds or even stitches didnt hold, or infections etc but the chances of having a REDO with a mech valve are lower than if you have a tissue valve and your less than 50 ish. Also just like there are many people in the real world, there are a few people here who had bleeds after procedures, or GI bleeds or brain bleeds who were doing fine for years and managed their INRs well. There still is a risk even with the newer valves and the developement of he INR and home testing.
One other thing I would suggest since you go to Brigham I would discuss te possibility down the road when a tissue valve wore out the chances of being able to replace it by cath and avoid OHS.(Valve in valve) I would never count on it, but it's a possibility and things are moving along quite well in the field. IF you are choosing tissue, I would also discuss if there are any tissue valves in use today that would make it easier to implant another valve in or more important and valves that they are finding so far that make interveneous valve more difficult. I would go for the valves they are having themost successs with now as long as they are equally good in all the other considerations.
Even planning on having another OHS, the chances a of a full recover are even now very high, altho nothing is 100%
.
Good luck with whatever choice you make
Enter your email address to join: