tommy said:Mark and Bill, how did you determine your race pace? Is it scientific, or art? Perceived effort? Heart rate? For some reason, by training book left that chapter out!![]()
Thanks.
Tom, my approach is homegrown. If it's consistent w/ any recommended guidelines, it's purely coincidence. But w/ that disclaimer:
I try to avoid shortness of breath while swimming, and breathe on every stroke. Swimming is easy for me - I used to be a successful competitive swimmer in my youth, so I still have my form, if not my engine. I always manage to land solidly in the mid-pack or higher w/o much effort. I always want to make sure I'm not out of breath before I jump on the bike.
I keep my HR about 140-150 on the bike in an Oly distance or shorter. That's vigorous riding for me, but I can sustain that for 25 miles without fading at the end. On a flat course on a calm day, that's a 17+ mph pace for me. If I spend too much time above 150, my HR gets too high on the run.
Running is my downfall. By the time I'm off the bike, running a 10 - 10+ minute pace raises my HR to about 160-165, and that translates to significant perceived effort for me. That's about 10 bpm higher than if I run a 10K that isn't preceded by swimming and biking. I can tolerate that for about 10K, and then I'm done. 170 is very uncomfortable for me (and also close to my theoretical max of 220-age). Yesterday, I was in the high 160's while barely moving. I decided to walk and let my HR drop, but I was only dropping to 150 while walking. I'd worry that there was something wrong with me if I hadn't had such a good 6 mile training run earlier in the week. I'll just write yesterday off as a bad day.
My post-surg resting HR has remained stubbornly high (78-80). Maybe that baseline has something to do with why I have trouble controlling my HR on the high end.
The bad day at the race is already paying benefits - I'm committed to a good training run first thing tomorrow morning!