As promised in my earlier post, I did a test this morning using both the old and new design test strips, and using both my "official" Alere provided INRatio2 meter and my Ebay purchased INRatio2 meter. The results are as follows:
INR= 2.9 using "Official" INRatio2 Meter using Old Design Test Strip.
INR= 2.7 using "Official" INRatio2 Meter using New Design Test Strip.
INR= 2.8 using "Ebay" INRatio2 Meter using Old Design Test Strip.
INR= 2.9 using "Ebay" INRatio2 Meter using New Design Test Strip.
The same lot of Old design test strips was used in both meters. The same lot of New design test strips was used in both meters.
A different finger was used for each of the 4 tests.
My conclusions from this test are that for my lots of test strips and my two meters:
- Both new and old designs of test strips yield acceptably similar test results
- Both my two meters agree to within acceptable limits
As I have said before, my INRatio2 meters have been generally giving me agreement with lab draw blood tests to within +/-0.2 in INR.
So, based on my own test, I don't think there is anything fundamentally wrong with the new improved wider sample area design test strips, and I do not see the 0.8 difference noted by "chaconne".
Nevertheless, I would be interested in hearing if anyone else performs a similar test comparison with the new design test strips and is willing to post their results.