allodwick said:
That is why I say that doctors, or whoever, says the answer to all variation problems is brand vs generic is just believing the marketing materials of years ago without spending the time to think it through on their own.
Al:
I'll contact the Texas A&M Vet School or the Savings & Clone Bank to get myself cloned. Then I can have a control "twin" -- one of us will take Coumadin, the other warfarin. We'll micromanage everything -- will live in a bubble so we won't be exposed to any bugs/germs, will get identical food/fluids measured out, same amount (if any) of alcohol on same day at same time, same identical amount/intensity of activity, same environmental temperature, etc. etc.
Then maybe we can tell if Coumadin produces more stable INR results than warfarin.
Seriously, there's no way to prove Coumadin does just that. Some people just aren't consistent in what they eat/drink, how active they are, medications they take/start taking/stop taking, etc. etc.
Some people's insurance plans are generous enough to allow them to use brand-name Rxes. Mine doesn't. 1mg Coumadin filled 90 tabs at a time via mail order would be $44.50 with my insurance plan -- $178 annually. 1mg warfarin is $20/90 tabs, $80 annually -- a savings of $98.
Many mechanical valvers need several strengths of warfarin to adjust as activity levels, meds, etc. affect INR, requiring more than just one $crip or $$crip, depending on whether you take warfarin or Coumadin.