Some insight into "minimally invasive"
Some insight into "minimally invasive"
Hi Y'all...
Great to be part of the loop now. Prior to surgery I was just a "fly on the wall" listening in and gathering info from other people's experiences and didn't really have anything to add or ask (as so many of my questions were being answered).
Ram... as I to my choice to go "cross-country" for my surgery, I began doing research on my options as soon as my natural valve started to really fail and I began having bad symptoms. I had been monitoring the valve for 15 years and when things got bad my cardiologist here in L.A. said it was time for replacement. He wanted me to have it done here in L.A. (USC, UCLA or Cedars-Sinai) but my research convinced me I wanted to go minimally invasive. I quickly discovered the top three places for this procedure were NYU, Cleveland Clinic, and Brigham Women's in Boston. Surprisingly, Los Angeles is NOT a place where minimally invasive has caught on.
I visited each facility the month before and interviewed all potential surgeons (exept Cosgrove who is booked so solidly in surgery each day he doesn't meet with patients beforehand). This "unavailability" factor alone narrowed it down to either Boston or NYU. Ribakove was so engaging, confident and amazingly willing to address ALL my questions and provide any info I needed to make an infoirmed decision (he spent over two hours with me) that that just cinched it. Lawrence Cohn at Boston was very brief and showed far less warmth and genuine empathy toward a person about to make a monumental health decision. I felt more like "new business for the hospital" than a person he wanted to care for and provide a new lease on life.
The big factor in making my choice was that there are TWO distinct types of minimally-invasive surgical approaches: a "mini-sternotomy" (Cleveland & Brigham) and an offshoot of the old "port-access" procedure (NYU) where the sternum is not cut but the heart is approached from between the ribs. There are decidedly two different camps here and a "war" seems to be being waged between them (mostly from the side of the mini-sternotomy camp).
Cosgrove is certainly a brilliant surgeon but he also loves the limelight and basks in his glory as a "pioneer" in the field of minimally invasive heart surgery. It is my opinion that he and other prominent leaders in this new technique don't want any competition and would like to see other approaches quashed so as not to divert attention (and business) from them. I liken it to the war between the two home-video formats being marketed to the public in the late 70's -- VHS and Beta. Both offered the public an amazing new product and were a groundbreaking development in entertainment, but Beta was empirically superior to VHS. It became a marketing war between the two formats and Beta (owned by Sony) played it's cards wrong and was eclipsed by VHS.
Sadly, one can also find politics, egos, and greed in even the noblest of professions and I found evidence of it in my research in this area.
With that, I hope this answers your question Ram, and gives some "food for thought" to others reading these posts who are contemplating their options for upcoming heart surgery.
Curious if Rich has read any of these posts since his last message. If so, Rich I assume you are only just home from the hospital? Are you a resident of NY? Why did you opt for NYU vs. Cleveland, Boston or others.?
Larry (aka Showhost)