Yeah, Suzanne's right up there with Kevin Trudeau :eek2::biggrin2:
I'm assuming that Cris is disparaging the fact that I mentioned Suzanne Somers. The books I'm referring to were mostly interviews with physicians who specialize in anti-aging, health, and hormone replacement. The opinions in the books I refer to aren't necessarily hers -- they're those of the health care professionals who she interviews.
I don't know much about Kevin Trudeau, but I don't think that the scholarship in his books can come anywhere close to what Suzanne brings to her books.
The idea of bioidenticals being better for the body than synthetically derived compounds taken from animals makes sense to me (but not necessarily others - and I'm not asking anyone to form an opinion or to have an opinion about bioidenticals).
Speaking only from personal experience, the experience of my wife, and the experience of friends on bioidentical therapy, I can only report positive results.
And, whether I learned about bioidenticals from Suzanne Somers (by virtue of the people she interviewed for her books), or from some prominent physician, my confidence in the superiority and safety of bioidentical over synthetic hormones would have probably been the same. I'm not telling anybody what they should or shouldn't do. I'm not even suggesting that you all should have open minds about these things. I wouldn't even be surprised if someone out there doesn't grab one of my sentences and quote me out of context. From my experience, and those of some people I'm close to, bioidenticals DO work. From my reading about the study that cast a bad light on hormone replacement therapy - the main problem was the source of the estrogens used - and shouldn't condemn ALL estrogen replacement therapy.
Please - don't negate the message because you don't like the messenger.