Heather Anne: My cardiologist said the same thing to me that yours did to you! One the other hand, Dr. Castro deos not consider it more risky because he does it this way for just about every surgery he does every day.
After a night of thinking (and luckily some sleep as well), I have narrowed it down to the following choices:
Option A: Tissue valve with Dr. Castro out of town. If I am likely to have another surgery, I would like the Dr. doing the first one to attempt to minimize the scaring. In addtion, Dr. Castro is very experienced with re-operations, so he could do my second one in 15 or so years.
Option B: Mechanical valve with Dr. Faber in town. With a mechanical and the ACT it requries, I am more interested in my cardiologist being part of the team through the surgery. My cardiologist already has had several conversations with Dr. Faber about my treatment and his office is physically connected to the local hospital. With ACT, I want the transistion from the hospital to the caridologist to be short pass not a "hail mary".
I plan to make a decision today and schedule surgery for early June. I agree with you that I feel much better having made the decision.
Thanks for all your thoughts and insight. -- Suzanne
Good to see you have an option A and option B. However, I am gonna play the devil's advocate.
Did Dr. Castro say 15 years or so with tissue valve? Cause that length of time has so far not been proven. And trans-catheter replacement is still only for high risk patients. So think about that option a bit before you jump on that ship. I have a tissue valve but know in my heart that I will likely need a replacement in maybe 5 more years (I of course am praying that the valve lasts longer). But anyway, good luck to you. I know that whatever decision you finally make will be in your best interest.