robojerry
Member
Hi everyone,
Hope you're all well or well on your way to getting there!
I've not posted on here for a long time but I know that over the past decade or so this place has been of great comfort and a font of information regarding all things valvey, and is always my first port of call if I have any worries, concerns or intrigues.
So I had AVR for a bicuspid valve 9 years ago at the age of 23. I went for a check-up today (apparently it was my first in 3 years!), and the valve is looking fine but the doctor did mention that my aorta (not the root but the bit past it, if that makes sense) was dilated at 4.1cm. Now this was the first I've heard of it so I'm a bit lost. They said that when I had an MRI 2.3 years ago that the aorta was at 4.1cm at that point so there has been no change over that time. He didn't seem overly concerned and we scheduled an appointment for 12 months time. I asked if it was a matter of "when rather than if" it would get worse and he said that it was "an if, with a but", in that it won't necessarily get worse but there's a higher chance that it will simply because of my medical history.
Does it all just simply mean that I've got a non-progressive dilated aorta? And the worry is that because its already 4.1cm, if it does begin to dilate further it will become an aneurysm much more quickly?
I asked lots of questions but you always think of more important ones on the way home, and the key question here is that could it have been at 4.1cm or thereabouts before the operation and hasn't progressed all that much over the 10 years post-op?
I know that no definative answers can be given because its all a bit vague but any info or advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Hope you're all well or well on your way to getting there!
I've not posted on here for a long time but I know that over the past decade or so this place has been of great comfort and a font of information regarding all things valvey, and is always my first port of call if I have any worries, concerns or intrigues.
So I had AVR for a bicuspid valve 9 years ago at the age of 23. I went for a check-up today (apparently it was my first in 3 years!), and the valve is looking fine but the doctor did mention that my aorta (not the root but the bit past it, if that makes sense) was dilated at 4.1cm. Now this was the first I've heard of it so I'm a bit lost. They said that when I had an MRI 2.3 years ago that the aorta was at 4.1cm at that point so there has been no change over that time. He didn't seem overly concerned and we scheduled an appointment for 12 months time. I asked if it was a matter of "when rather than if" it would get worse and he said that it was "an if, with a but", in that it won't necessarily get worse but there's a higher chance that it will simply because of my medical history.
Does it all just simply mean that I've got a non-progressive dilated aorta? And the worry is that because its already 4.1cm, if it does begin to dilate further it will become an aneurysm much more quickly?
I asked lots of questions but you always think of more important ones on the way home, and the key question here is that could it have been at 4.1cm or thereabouts before the operation and hasn't progressed all that much over the 10 years post-op?
I know that no definative answers can be given because its all a bit vague but any info or advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!