AZ Don
Well-known member
Peer reviewed studies that can be replicated are the core of the scientific process. As I said, most of your posts look to me to be opinion, not science. You and those you quote are entitled to your opinion. If you want to see what science says about low carb diets, this short video reviews both a meta analysis of studies and one that directly compared vegetarians to those following a low carb diet. At the end of the study, the vegetarian group showed a reversal of artheriosclerotic plaque, the low carb diet group showed significant increase in blockages in their arteries.You don't need 'peer reviewed' studies to understand the science linking carbohydrates to heart disease.
http://nutritionfacts.org/video/low-carb-diets-and-coronary-blood-flow/
And here is a list of what leading medical groups think of the Atkins diet (the original low carb diet):
http://www.atkinsexposed.org/
The problem for Atkins (and his sheepdog), though, is that the National Academy of Sciences, the most prestigious scientific body in the United States, agrees with the AMA and the ADA in opposing the Atkins Diet.[13] So does theAmerican Cancer Society;[14] and the American Heart Association;[15] and the Cleveland Clinic;[16] and Johns Hopkins;[17] and the American Kidney Fund;[18] and the American College of Sports Medicine;[19] and the National Institutes of Health.[20]
In fact there does not seem to be a single major governmental or nonprofit medical, nutrition, or science-based organization in the world that supports the Atkins Diet.[21] As a 2004 medical journal review concluded, the Atkins Diet "runs counter to all the current evidence-based dietary recommendations."[22]