Hi
erik;n872943 said:
"Risk compensation is a theory which suggests that people typically adjust their behavior in response to the perceived level of risk, becoming more careful where they sense greater risk and less careful if they feel more protected. Although usually small in comparison to the fundamental benefits of safety interventions, it may result in a lower net benefit than expected"
Applies to kitesurfing too, somebody mentioned me that he instinctly takes more risk with a helmet and also mentioned that he is less aware of what was going on around him when being on the water.... Something to meditate on....
Its well documented ... out of interest was that word meant to be instinctively or distinctly? Either works but meaning changes (both within scope of autoincorrect features of phones)
As it happens on my "main bike" (which is a YamahaT-Max 500cc scooter) I use an open face around town and a full face on the highway. I do this for almost exactly the same reasons your friend mentions. On the highway (where speeds are of course much higher) I value the visor (as Warwick observed) and the face protection provided in a "knockout" where you may slide face first for some time (observational experience involved in this one) and you may loose part of your jaw and some teeth foundation material too.
Around town I prefer the open face because I prefer to feel the breeze (I always wear safety glasses) and the increased visibility.
Also around town I often wear shorts and a T shirt (with gloves always ... I once had a small "off" that ripped my fingertips badly ... made the function of the daily wiping of ones butt awkward for a while) because it makes me more concerned and more aware ... I've had a few "slides down the road" in leathers and one or two without. I know which I prefer and why. Around town however my view is that an impact with a car at an intersection is the more likely problem and leathers don't help much with that.
Is it true or a fairytale that the ON-X valve requires lower INR that the St Judes? normally people talk about INR between 2.5 and 3.5, but you mentioned 2 - 3....
I think your wording there of "requires" is helpful to explain this. On-X is a company, a new one in the area of valves. They are looking for a "niche" to provide a differential for themselves. So they went to the trouble of getting approval for the lowered INR.
Does this make them different to St Jude or Medtronics / ATS? I don't think it does as the GELIA study clearly demonstrates that we are still a little conservative on our minimum INR levels for Aortic mechanical valves. GELIA suggests a minimum of 2. is safe from thrombosis.
However the reality of being at 2 is like the reality of flying on the edge ... very easy to drop over the line into danger zones. If you were attempting to be hovering around 1.7 you'd make inevitable dips into 1.2 ... dangerous area that. I'm quite sure that On-X would be keen to investigate your INR history if you attempted to sue them.
I manage my INR by the method of using a "target" and accepting some variance but minimising it. This is functionally equivalent to a range of (say) 2 ~3
For instance
my "mean" is (based on last year) 2.6
my standard deviation is 0.4
so even at 2 standard deviations from my mean (meaning rare as you see below) my INR would still be above 1.7 [IMG2=JSON]{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-QKNj9Jl-dhw\/U205uh7lgwI\/AAAAAAAAFB8\/l0ovwh2qaHs\/s1600\/standardDeviationBellCurve.jpg"}[/IMG2]
Read this post of mine for more on this point:
cjeastwd.blogspot.com/2017/01/2016-inr-data.html
Actually, the blog is yours??? thanks dude for sharing your experiences to the world...
yes, the blog is mine ... covers interests, publications, help which I wanted to centralise (rather than type it again and again as punishment in class) for distribution when Frequently Asked Questions arose on forums, humor and just
daily life.
Glad you like it.
Should you get a mechanical you'll find this "series" of posts helpful:
http://cjeastwd.blogspot.com/2014/09...ng-my-inr.html
http://cjeastwd.blogspot.com/2015/10...r-example.html
http://cjeastwd.blogspot.com/2014/05...ocks-dose.html
I think that's not just a good starter for a newbie on warfarin but a good reference for anyone who is more interested (but not a University researcher)