L
liam13
Well, I met with the cardiac surgeon I'd decided to go with after my research today. He viewed a copy of my echo from 6/11. I left with information I had not expected to get. It was good information, just unexpected. He did note that he couldn't explain why the LV was enlarged, but given the level of my leakage that did not explain why the LV enlarged. He thought maybe a viral infection at some point in the past. He said if I was a family member of his he would hold off on the surgery and just watch the LV every 6 months. If I had the surgery he would strongly recommend the St. Jude and doesn't trust the On-X yet. Given my age 47 in a week, he would steer clear of a tissue replacement, which I concur with. He suggested changing from a beta blocker to an Ace inhibitor, and thought that may bring the size of the LV down. . . which would reduce the leakage. . . which could possibly push surgery off "several years". He also didn't think the lightheadedness and chest discomfort is cardiac in nature, given what he saw. I felt really good about how he presented himself, his apparent depth of knowledge and ability to present it to me. I felt a good level of trust, and don't feel compelled to pursue a second opinion right now. I'm seeing my cardiologist tomorrow to talk to him about changing meds and about the enlarged LV and doing another echo in 6 months, instead of 12 months. What a day. . . still feel a little bit disoriented by the information. But overall I feel great about it. If I can postpone the surgery, I'm happy to do that. This site is so great. Liam