Julie,
The funny thing is I didn't really have any signs at first. During a drive from SFO to SEA in one day, I stopped in mid Oregon and had a 5 hour energy drink (not recommended). That really helped with the drive but the next day I felt like I had an irregular heart beat. I went into my GP's office (Jun 09) and he did an EKG which was normal but wanted me to see a cardio as it had been a year and a half or so. On the visit to the cardio (an out of network doc) he said I had "some leaking". He wanted to do a TEE. At that point I decided to get a "in network" cardio and went to my current cardio a couple of weeks later (July 09). He told me he didn't a TEE because he really didn't care WHY the valve was leaking, just the fact that it was probably warranted surgery within the year or the beginning of the next year. I really didn't feel that bad, maybe fatigued at times, but no pain or real shortness of breath. Within 1 month, the shortness of breath became extremely noticeable. I made an appointment with the new cardio again and he said my valve had worsened and now was the time. I was told the regurgitation was severe. I spend a few weeks thinking the local guy the cardio recommended (not Verrier) would do the surgery but he said things to me that made me and my wife cringe, include "we all have to go sometime". My valve continued to deteriorate over the month it took to arrange surgery at Stanford and I was in pretty bad shape prior to my 2nd surgery. Dr. Miller told me my measurement of leakage was as high as it got and the amount of blood being output was at a level where generally they are trying revive the patient.
Your tissue valve can go south pretty quickly. Best to keep an eye on things.
The funny thing is I didn't really have any signs at first. During a drive from SFO to SEA in one day, I stopped in mid Oregon and had a 5 hour energy drink (not recommended). That really helped with the drive but the next day I felt like I had an irregular heart beat. I went into my GP's office (Jun 09) and he did an EKG which was normal but wanted me to see a cardio as it had been a year and a half or so. On the visit to the cardio (an out of network doc) he said I had "some leaking". He wanted to do a TEE. At that point I decided to get a "in network" cardio and went to my current cardio a couple of weeks later (July 09). He told me he didn't a TEE because he really didn't care WHY the valve was leaking, just the fact that it was probably warranted surgery within the year or the beginning of the next year. I really didn't feel that bad, maybe fatigued at times, but no pain or real shortness of breath. Within 1 month, the shortness of breath became extremely noticeable. I made an appointment with the new cardio again and he said my valve had worsened and now was the time. I was told the regurgitation was severe. I spend a few weeks thinking the local guy the cardio recommended (not Verrier) would do the surgery but he said things to me that made me and my wife cringe, include "we all have to go sometime". My valve continued to deteriorate over the month it took to arrange surgery at Stanford and I was in pretty bad shape prior to my 2nd surgery. Dr. Miller told me my measurement of leakage was as high as it got and the amount of blood being output was at a level where generally they are trying revive the patient.
Your tissue valve can go south pretty quickly. Best to keep an eye on things.
Last edited: