PJmomrunner
Well-known member
The following link will give a good overview of the BAV: http://www.emedicine.com/ped/topic2486.htm The aforementioned article does suggest that there are occasional instances of acquired BAV following infective endocarditis, but PubMed searching reveals only one 1973 reference.
Recent research points to BAV being a highly heritable (89%) genetic trait.(1) Other research suggests strongly that BAV is an autosomal dominant trait with reduced penetrance. (2,3) Autosomal dominant inheritance means that the gene carrying a mutation is located on one of the autosomes (chromosome pairs 1 through 22). This means that males and females are equally likely to inherit the mutation. "Dominant" means that having a mutation in just one of the two copies of a particular gene is all it takes for a person to have a trait, such as BAV. When a parent has a dominant gene mutation, there is a 50 percent chance that any child he/she has will also inherit the mutation.
There are four possible combinations in the children. Two of the four, or 50 percent, have inherited the mutation. The other 50 percent have not inherited the mutation. These four combinations are possible every time a pregnancy occurs between these two individuals. The gender of the children (whether they are sons or daughters) does not matter. The chance is 50/50 for each pregnancy.
An important characteristic of dominant gene mutations is that they can have variable expression. This means that some people have milder or more severe symptoms than others. In addition, which systems of the body the mutation affects can vary as can the age at which the disease starts, even in the same family. Another important characteristic of dominant gene mutations is that in some cases, they can have reduced penetrance. This means that sometimes a person can have a dominant mutation but not show any signs of disease. (3)
As I believe you stated in another post on this thread, why one has BAV probably doesn't matter much, except in the case where believing that it is acquired prevents one's first-degree relatives (parents and kids) from being checked. And as for your dad's valve being a "fused trileaflet," every description I have found of bicuspid valves describes a fusion of 2 of three leaflets. One leaflet is usually small and the other is a conjoined version of the other two, with three sinuses.
I'm glad you're talking to surgeons. Most here, as you've probably discovered, believe they are the go-to-guys.
Good luck.
P. J.
My references:
(1) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15234422&query_hl=15
(2) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...d&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9385911&query_hl=18
(3) http://www.marfan.org/nmf/GetContentRequestHandler.do?menu_item_id=87
(4) http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/uvahealth/hub_cancer/adi.cfm
Recent research points to BAV being a highly heritable (89%) genetic trait.(1) Other research suggests strongly that BAV is an autosomal dominant trait with reduced penetrance. (2,3) Autosomal dominant inheritance means that the gene carrying a mutation is located on one of the autosomes (chromosome pairs 1 through 22). This means that males and females are equally likely to inherit the mutation. "Dominant" means that having a mutation in just one of the two copies of a particular gene is all it takes for a person to have a trait, such as BAV. When a parent has a dominant gene mutation, there is a 50 percent chance that any child he/she has will also inherit the mutation.
There are four possible combinations in the children. Two of the four, or 50 percent, have inherited the mutation. The other 50 percent have not inherited the mutation. These four combinations are possible every time a pregnancy occurs between these two individuals. The gender of the children (whether they are sons or daughters) does not matter. The chance is 50/50 for each pregnancy.
An important characteristic of dominant gene mutations is that they can have variable expression. This means that some people have milder or more severe symptoms than others. In addition, which systems of the body the mutation affects can vary as can the age at which the disease starts, even in the same family. Another important characteristic of dominant gene mutations is that in some cases, they can have reduced penetrance. This means that sometimes a person can have a dominant mutation but not show any signs of disease. (3)
As I believe you stated in another post on this thread, why one has BAV probably doesn't matter much, except in the case where believing that it is acquired prevents one's first-degree relatives (parents and kids) from being checked. And as for your dad's valve being a "fused trileaflet," every description I have found of bicuspid valves describes a fusion of 2 of three leaflets. One leaflet is usually small and the other is a conjoined version of the other two, with three sinuses.
I'm glad you're talking to surgeons. Most here, as you've probably discovered, believe they are the go-to-guys.
Good luck.
P. J.
My references:
(1) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15234422&query_hl=15
(2) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...d&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9385911&query_hl=18
(3) http://www.marfan.org/nmf/GetContentRequestHandler.do?menu_item_id=87
(4) http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/uvahealth/hub_cancer/adi.cfm
windsurfer said:Great discussion. My dad had "BAV" and and AVR at 74 about 2 years after I was diagnosed with BAV. But the surgeon said his was a fused trileaflet. Later another cardiologist thought my echo looked like a fused trileaflet. It is my understanding that the fusing is caused by some damage to the surface layer and the normal healing process causes calcification or fusing of the leaflets. That also may be the reason why some "BAV" are not congenital e.g RF, or fen-fen diet drug or perhaps inflammation where the base of the leaflets rub when inflammed (think of the donut hole shrinking when it becomes inflammed and the bases of the leaflets rubbing due to the tighter fit),,...
However, I think it is difficult to distinguish between congenital BAV and subsequently environmentally induced fusing just by an echo when caught at a late stage. Perhaps only after surgery do they really know.
But just the same, if the jet stream of the stenosis can weaken the aorta when your peak gradient exceeds a certain level - in my case over 70 mmhg then it seems we should be managing our blood pressure as a preventative effort and go to surgery sooner than is often recommended. I'm on no BP medications. One of my cardiologists feels I should avoid surgery until symptoms appear - perhaps a year or so from now despite the latest echo showing 0.7 cm2 and 70mmhg peak. I'm talking to surgeons now regardless of his recommendations.
Bobco