Article in Chicago Trib's Tempo section today

Valve Replacement Forums

Help Support Valve Replacement Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
K

Karlynn

Anyone know of this? Since I don't pay a lot of attention to tissue valve advancements, this could very well have been discussed here and I didn't read it. It sounds promising, but the big gap that wasn't discussed in regards to longevity performance was in the large age group between "child" and 80 year-olds.


New heart valve option
Still undergoing U.S. trials, device approved in Europe

By Terri Yablonsky Stat
Special to the Tribune
Published April 25, 2006


For people facing the breakdown of an aortic valve, the choice hasn't been pleasant: Replace it with an animal-tissue valve that itself may need replacing or with a manmade version that condemns the patient to a life of blood thinners and dietary restrictions. But a new heart valve still in clinical studies shows promise of being more biocompatible and mechanically durable than any tissue valve.

The SuperStentless Plus valve, manufactured by Shelhigh Inc., Millburn, N.J., is in Food and Drug Administration clinical trials at Central DuPage Hospital in Winfield. Made of cow pericardium and pig leaflets, the valve has been approved for use in Europe, where it has been used for nine years, and has been in U.S. trials for five years.

Patients who need a valve replacement have had to choose between a tissue valve or a mechanical version. Because mechanical valves make the blood clot, patients with these valves must take Coumadin, a blood thinner, the rest of their lives. That's why many patients prefer tissue, or biologic, valves from cows or pigs.

Tissue valves eventually wear out, however, and require replacement. "The younger you are, the faster it wears out," said Dr. Marc Gerdisch, director of cardiac surgery at Central DuPage Hospital. Typical tissue valves historically have failed because the body recognizes the valve as foreign matter, and the valve slowly deteriorates.

Though all other tissue valves deteriorate and calcify within a few years, no child or adult over age 80 has demonstrated tissue failure or calcification with the Shelhigh valve, according to Gerdisch. Babies usually have an accelerated calcification process, but those with the Shelhigh valve show no calcification, he said, adding, "The evidence is very strong that in an older person, the likelihood of valve deterioration is very low."

When Shelhigh valves have been removed, such as in a child who has outgrown one, the valves have been covered with a normal layer of endothelium, the material that lines the inside of blood vessels. That means the valve is being incorporated by the body, Gerdisch said. "No other valve grows normal endothelium, or normal cellular lining," he said.

Too, other valves commonly start failing within five years, Gerdisch explained. "I don't think there's ever been a tissue valve with the mechanical durability to withstand the continuous opening and closing of a valve," he said. Based on the science thus far, he expects the Shelhigh valve will outlast previous tissue valves.

The valve is implanted in a minimally invasive procedure using a very small incision. The breast bone is not divided, so the patient can return to normal activities sooner than with conventional valve replacement.

Gerdisch has implanted the valve in 35 patients so far with excellent results, he said. Because the valve is part of an FDA trial, he is limited to using it in people age 55 and over, but "I anticipate that age will lower."

The Shelhigh valve can be available for children up to 10 years of age in the U.S. through an FDA humanitarian device exemption, so the valve in small sizes can be implanted in the pediatric population.

Gerdisch recently implanted the valve in James Stade, 65, of Wheaton, who suffered congestive heart failure. "My aortic valve was calcified and wasn't opening properly," Stade said. "Three days after surgery, I came home from the hospital. I feel fine."

Stade's energy level has seen a boost since the surgery.

"I can now stay up late working on my patent drawings," said Stade, who owns a patent-illustration business in Chicago. "I'm not getting mentally fatigued like before."

If all continues to go well in trials, Gerdisch predicts FDA approval of the valve in about a year.
 
Interesting. Thanks for posting the article. Would like to hear more about it when the trial is over. Hats off to those who are participating.
 
That sounds like an awesome advancement to those of us who may face AVR in the future. I had determined that if I ever face valve replacement it would be mechanical. This is the first alternative I've heard of that may sway me. Still, hopefully I won't have to make that choice. Very interesting article.
 
Thanks for the article, Karlynn- this sounds really promising- hope the trials go well!
 
Cool -- and just think of what'll be standard fare in another 15-20 years!! (Gawd, I hope I look just as young as now :cool: )
 
Karlynn said:
manmade version that condemns the patient to a life of blood thinners and dietary restrictions.

Where does it stop? They make it sound like mechanical is a death sentence for no reason.

Sorry, it just erks me to no end when stupid comments like this are made.
 
Cow AND pig?! Wouldn't know whether to moo or oink. :p

You're right, Karlynn -- there's a lot of territory between baby and 80 that seems to remain a large question mark. Hard to say how much is hype and how much is true promise, but it's an interesting article. Thanks for posting it.
 
Ross said:
Where does it stop? They make it sound like mechanical is a death sentence for no reason.

Sorry, it just erks me to no end when stupid comments like this are made.

Amen, Ross.

I've been eating EXACTLY the way I did before my surgery and have remained in range. So much for restrictions.

Also had my 110 pound Saint Bernard/Husky plow right into my knee at speed. No bruise and no swelling. I think it hurt him worse than me.

Randy
 
Randy & Robyn said:
Amen, Ross.

I've been eating EXACTLY the way I did before my surgery and have remained in range. So much for restrictions.

Also had my 110 pound Saint Bernard/Husky plow right into my knee at speed. No bruise and no swelling. I think it hurt him worse than me.

Randy[/QUOTE
Hi i have a quick qestion on the ONX valve is the ticking a real problem at first? and what is it like to live with. they say that the ONX valve noise is less then the St Jude

Thanks for the feed back still trying to decide i am 47 and would like to go with the new Magna tissue value but oncerned about the longevity. But with the new advancements reop in the future will be less invassive.

Any thoughts?
 
Ross said:
Where does it stop? They make it sound like mechanical is a death sentence for no reason.

Sorry, it just erks me to no end when stupid comments like this are made.

Yes, it does me too and I had thought of writing an email to the writer of the article, referring them to this site and giving them some needed info.
 
Would any of my fellow condemned prisoners like to join me having a big spinach salad and a bottle of wine?;) :D ;)
 
teribtye said:
Hi i have a quick qestion on the ONX valve is the ticking a real problem at first? and what is it like to live with. they say that the ONX valve noise is less then the St Jude

Thanks for the feed back still trying to decide i am 47 and would like to go with the new Magna tissue value but oncerned about the longevity. But with the new advancements reop in the future will be less invassive.

Any thoughts?

No problem with the ticking. I can only hear it in small, perfectly quiet rooms. No one else has heard it except when my wife has her head right on my chest. That isn't to say it will be that quiet for everyone. But it is my experience.

Right now, I feel great and am absolutely content with my choice. I would never trade my mechanical for a valve that would definitely send me back to the OR in a few years. That's my opinion.

Randy
 
geebee said:
Would any of my fellow condemned prisoners like to join me having a big spinach salad and a bottle of wine?;) :D ;)
Honey you know I will. Throw in some brussel sprouts and for giggles, some broccoli too.
 
geebee said:
Would any of my fellow condemned prisoners like to join me having a big spinach salad and a bottle of wine?;) :D ;)

Promise that the salad will be that really good kind with the sweet dressing and the bacon. Ross, bring a huge bunch of brussel sprouts. I truly could make a meal out of just them - with butter of course. We could have green Jello for desert!:D And then run with scissors!:D :D :D :D
 
Karlynn said:
Promise that the salad will be that really good kind with the sweet dressing and the bacon. Ross, bring a huge bunch of brussel sprouts. I truly could make a meal out of just them - with butter of course. We could have green Jello for desert!:D And then run with scissors!:D :D :D :D
And don't forget shaving WITH A RAZOR BLADE.:eek: :eek: :eek:

BTW - is there any other kind of dressing worth putting on a good spinach salad than the sweet kind with bacon and thinly sliced red onions???? OMG - I am heading to the store.;) :D ;)

Ross, love Brussel Sprouts, espcially the tiny ones with lots of butter. YUMMMMM
 
Karlynn said:
clinical trials at Central DuPage Hospital in Winfield
CDH is where I recovered from bacterial endocarditis. Made quite an investment in penicillin.....ran them out of the large doses and had to suck down multiples of the smaller ones.

I had been living in Chicagoland 2 months. I got settled in my hospital room and the nurse comes by with a 2" thick chart, says "welcome back". I said "I DON'T THINK SO! GET THEE OUTTA HERE AND GET ME A NEW CHART." It turns out that there were two of us with the same name living a few miles apart. I still didn't know what sub-acute bacterial endocarditis meant, nor what it would eventually require. Heck, I couldn't even pronounce it...those big latin words. I've always wondered about the other fellow's medical history, and if I surpassed him in chart volume. Seriously, the care was excellent.

Karlynn et al said:
manmade version that condemns the patient to a life of blood thinners and dietary restrictions.
Yeah, condemn me, like I'm really dying with this darn metal thing in me.:D Tonight I shall eat spinach and run with scissors!:rolleyes: I got a lethal paper cut today. Oh the humanity!
 
Please people!

Please people!

Don't let's make this post one of those "mech valvers get defensive" ones. For one thing, the authors of the article won't be reading this forum.

The point they were trying to make to the general public was that there are known, non-trivial drawbacks with mech valves and that it is highly desirable to find an alternative.

I'd really like to hear more about this valve. The fact that it was absorbed into the body and shows now calcification makes it truly fascinating

no child or adult over age 80 has demonstrated tissue failure or calcification with the Shelhigh valve, according to Gerdisch

So come on folks, let's gather information and keep on topic. It ever we encounter some misinformation like this again, it should be easy for Ross to post a link to one of the "Truth about anticoagulation" posts.
 
Andyrdj said:
Don't let's make this post one of those "mech valvers get defensive" ones. For one thing, the authors of the article won't be reading this forum.

The point they were trying to make to the general public was that there are known, non-trivial drawbacks with mech valves and that it is highly desirable to find an alternative.

For the benefit of new folks reading these threads, I will not let that slide. They come here to learn and ask questions. What that article contained in that one simple statement is pure misinformation on the writers part with a twist, and it's dead wrong! Misinformation is misinformation, nothing defensive about this.
 
Yep

Yep

The point I was trying to make, Ross, is that your post was necessary to correct the misinformation, but following that we have around 9 or 10 posts about mech valves, compared to about 5 or 6 posts around the original topic - leaving discussion on an interesting new development in danger of being swamped by information which is duplicated elsewhere on the board.

It does seem to happen a fair bit on this board. I'm not trying to be nasty to anyone, please understand:eek: . But new topics need their space, and the "Myths of anticoagulation" topic has been very thoroughly explored elsewhere. Hence my suggestion that we restrain the temptation to bite back.
 
Back
Top