Donna,
I'm glad we and others can support each other.
Me strong? Not really. Just doing what needs to be done. I cheated last night with a bowl of tomato soup.
Yes, being melanoma-free for 2 1/2 years and counting is fodder for cheer.
Sorry about your pain. What is the next step for you?
The PET scan attaches radioactivity to glucose. When the solution is dispersed in the body, the sugar (with it's piggyback) attaches to inflammmations, metastases, etc. The radiation shows up on the screen.
Well, the amount of my bleeding has not changed
- very noticable, but little volume. This morning, I passed a bunch of clots
. That is new and undesirable deterioration. I had some lengthy phone calls with the GE on call and the cardiologist on call. I uploaded the history and told them I'm in a pickle.
The GE gave me a lot of listening and a lot of feedback, but it basically boiled down to the "standard answer". "If you have been losing blood, go to ER to check blood levels." Other than that, if they are going back in to re-cauterize, they will want a full prep (cleansing)
. So I've upgraded my diet from "liquid" to "soft"
. I still want to avoid abrasion in the colon. As far as blood levels, I'm fine. I have zero dizziness, no tachacardia (high heart rate). Resting rate around 60 bpm. I assume my blood pressure is fine. My wife has a cuff, just haven't bothered to check it - I'll do that later today. If I have lost significant blood, the heart rate and pressure would elevate to compensate. I'm convinced, that I'm okay, so am not going to spend Easter in the ER, without symptoms.
The cardiologist was wonderful. Again, we talked at length. The "takeaways" are as follows:
1. He believes that we sometimes take anticoagulation too far (specifically) for aortic valve patients. (I know that is blashpemy in here). He said that there are no official rules about bridge therapy. He spent a fair amount of time with me discussing all aspects of my case. He thinks that we started back on anti-coagulation too soon after the colonscopy.
2. At my prompting, he said that if I were to have a stroke
, there is no real benefit to have it in the hospital than at home. Doctors would want to withhold anticoagulants until the bleeding stops
. Lovely!
4. A man of my health is probably replenishing blood supplies as fast as I'm losing it (slow leak).
3. He says that Lovenox is a very powerful drug. I told him my body agrees, that from my previous "bridges" including this one, that I bleed more on Lovenox than Coumadin. Arm excision and hernia surgeries. Even today, a few scratches on my finger are swollen much worse than they would be on Coumadin
. I asked him about reducing the Lovenox dose. He prefers me to hold 2 doses (24 hours) and see how it goes overnight.
So, both doctors gave me their opinions and suggestions, but the decisions are up to me. My wife and I talked it over, and this is where we are:
1. The bleeding has to stop.
2. The current anti-coagulation regimin is not working.
3. Everyone reacts differently to Coumadin and Lovenox.
4. I've been on 24 hour hiatus before without incident.
5. I'm taking my cardio's suggestion to hold Lovenox for 24 hours.
a. If the bleeding stops, I stay on soft diet and go back on Lovenox and Coumadin at the same time.
b. If the bleeding stays at the same rate, I go back on Lovenox (or check into the hospital and do heparin) until I can get the thing re-cauterized.
c. If there is improvement, but the bleeding hasn't stopped, I'll have another heart to heart (pun intended) with the docs. This time it will be with the primary guys, not the on-call guys.
d. If the bleeding gets worse, I go back in for emergency flush and cauterize.
There is risk either way. Two recent VR stories loom weigh heaivly on me. One of bleeding and one of stroke. I'm in the middle where I want to be, but still leaking.
On the lighter side, I gave up eating ice cream for lent. Doesn't ice cream fall under "soft foods"?
I'm not waiting for your answer.