My son had his aortic valve replaced at 18 yrs old in Boston right before college with a 25mm Edward life science pericardial valve.
...
I’m wondering if there are any young guys girls out there that have similar stories and what they have found out , recommendations , or
I'm no longer young, but I was. I would say first that his concerns about AC therapy due to the mentioned reasons are perhaps overblown (although getting fall down drunk is not a good idea). I help a few younger people manage their INR (in their late 20's) and they've found too that much of the "myth" associated with being on Anti Coagulation Therapy is based on stories passed around (even in the medical community) and on the experiences of the badly managed elderly. Make no mistake though, failing to deal with ACT properly (take your drugs) will potentially have consequences ... but then so to will a 3rd and 4th and ... surgery.
I had my first OHS at 10 (essentially a repair) and my 2nd at 28 when that valve subsequently (expectedly) calcified and became incompetent. As it happened I was at Uni again doing my second degree (lets avoid the reasons for re-training).
On that occasion I got a homograft which was cryo-preserved, partly because my surgeon and that team were of the view that method was ideal and partly because my surgeon felt that managing being on warfarin wasn't the ideal choice for me at that time (perhaps he had some other unspoken ideas).
That homograft lasted me about 20 years, it may have lasted longer but as I had an aortic aneurysm develop that needed replacement it didn't get to squeeze out that last few years.
I now have a mechanical (so yes, that's my 3rd OHS at the age of 48) and manage INR myself.
My findings of life with a mechanical valve are that I was able to restore my health and fitness to levels that exceeded where I was before having that valve. I've found that it works very well (as indeed one would expect) and am confident that I will not need any further surgery for the valve. I'm keen on Cross Country Skiing (about as much on track as off) and after surgery managed to build myself back up to fitter than I was before (I've done XC Skiing since 2006 with some enthusiasm, including some sled pulling trips out in the wild.
This selfie image was on a days lake skiing taken in 2014 in Finland (where I was living)
I'm back in Australia now and sadly Australia does not encourage daily fitness as much as Finland does. So I know I've slipped a bit (ok, and other cumulative injuries make it harder too)
The trade off with Mechanical vs Tissue is of course Tissue (largely but not exclusively) allows you to avoid ACT(blood thinners) while Mechanical largely but not exclusively allows you to avoid re-operation from Structural Valve Degradation (of which you know something about.now).
I would expect that my surgeon back then would have a different view of being on AC therapy now because so much has changed. Back then even the term INR was not around and everyone used ProThrombin Time, as well Point of Care machines such as my Coaguchek did not exist and management of INR was often monthly blood draws. The risk of harm from ACT is significantly improved with the move to weekly testing and dose administration afforded by PoC machines.
I feel that this segment from a talk on the matter by Dr Schaff is worth listening to:
I'd have some more detailed questions, but in your situation I would strongly suggest that the mechanical choice is your best bet at that age. One does not get less risk with each subsequent surgery and indeed the risk of further damage (to the rest of the body systems) increases as well as the risks of post surgical infections.
Lastly I have my thoughts on a few related matters on my blog (saves me retyping them all the time too).
The points as I see them:
http://cjeastwd.blogspot.com/2014/01/heart-valve-information-for-choices.html
... and on management of AC Therapy (warfarin)
http://cjeastwd.blogspot.com/2014/09/managing-my-inr.html
Remember, administering ACT is far less onerous than say, developing diabetes, and has far better outcomes too. People with diabetes manage their multiple times per day blood draws to determine sugar levels (while ACT is weekly) and we don't really need to alter our diet (despite the myths).
Please feel free to contact me if you feel inclined to talk. I can spend time on the phone with you if you like. PM me if you are of that mind.
Best Wishes.