Hank
VR.com Founder, Now just a Member
Howdy Folks - I am interested in seeing what INR home testing monitors everyone uses. Please take a moment to answer the poll and we'll see what results we come up with.... Thanks..
Cris N said:I'm just starting the process to get a monitor. After discussion with QAS I chose the Protime.
Cris
HemoSense-Brendan said:Chris:
I'd be interested in knowing, if you're comfortable sharing, what advantages you found in ProTime that prompted your selection of their monitor.
Congratulations on joining the home PT/INR world!
Brendan
Karlynn said:I'd be interested as well, since I have a ProTime monitor and am in the process of trying to get my insurance to approve the purchase of an INRatio machine.[/QUOTE
On board controls and sensitive thromboplastin- ISI 1 make the INRatio state of the art at this time.
Marty said:Karlynn said:I'd be interested as well, since I have a ProTime monitor and am in the process of trying to get my insurance to approve the purchase of an INRatio machine.[/QUOTE
On board controls and sensitive thromboplastin- ISI 1 make the INRatio state of the art at this time.
Which is one of the reasons I'm interested in why she chose the ProTime.
Cris N said:2 primary reasons. I'm having trouble reconciling the INRatio apparent recommendation that the INR should be .6 higher than target as was discussed in the "Welcome Brendan from Hemosense" thread. The other is the collection method... it seems to be a little bit easier with the Protime than INRatio - but I don't have any experience.
I haven't yet turned in my paperwork (waiting for the 1st of the year so I can use my flex spending money for deductible) and so I am still have a somewhat open mind.
Cris